Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hmm. I'm running RH 6.2 and /usr/bin/etags is the GNU version:
I just looked into it and it looks like etags was distributed with the
version of emacs (20.5) that was distributed with RedHat 6.2. They've
removed
On 21 Dec 2000, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> creche. etags --version
> etags (GNU Emacs 20.5)
> Copyright (C) 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc. and Ken Arnold
> This program is distributed under the same terms as Emacs
>
>
Index: m4/init.m4
===
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/m4/init.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 m4/init.m4
--- m4/init.m4 2000/10/10 00:18:52 1.20
+++ m4/init.m4 2000/12/21 18:07:02
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
# some
> "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Derek> I added rudimentary support for different implementations of
Derek> etags (read the one Automake expects and Exuberent etags) since
Derek> they take slightly different options. Exuberent etags is the
Derek> version distributed wit
"Derek R. Price" wrote:
> > > I added a macro to test for the presence of etags and whether it
> > > supports "--etags-include=" or "-i " for includes.
Okay, one more try. I hadn't added etags.m4 to the Makefile.am so it wasn't being
installed and I also tweaked the AM_PROG_ETAGS macro to call
Raja R Harinath wrote:
> > I added a macro to test for the presence of etags and whether it
> > supports "--etags-include=" or "-i " for includes.
>
> If Exuberent etags is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for Emacs
> etags, it should support the same options. Otherwise, it is a bug in
> the
Hi,
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I added rudimentary support for different implementations of etags (read
> the one Automake expects and Exuberent etags) since they take slightly
> different options. Exuberent etags is the version distributed with
> RedHat Linux 6.2 & I believe
I added rudimentary support for different implementations of etags (read
the one Automake expects and Exuberent etags) since they take slightly
different options. Exuberent etags is the version distributed with
RedHat Linux 6.2 & I believe Debian and a few others.
I added a macro to test for the
