Hi William,
* William Pursell wrote on Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:06:10PM CET:
> The bare 'automake' occurs often in automake.texi where
> it should be @command{automake}. There is some inconsistency,
> however, in that often 'Automake' is used, and I am unsure
> if it is appropriate to change such
Hi William,
* William Pursell wrote on Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:06:32PM CET:
> Fix object/article consistency (eg "an flag" becomes "a flag"),
> correct minor punctuation errors, etc.
Thanks! Pushed with a couple of minor changes, as below.
> @@ -7839,7 +7839,7 @@ suppress the base name step. F
Hi William,
* William Pursell wrote on Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:06:18PM CET:
>
> There are several occurences of the phrase 'at configure time'
> where it may be appropriate to make this change as well, but
> it is not clear to me that doing so is correct and I'm
> applying the principal of minimal
Hi Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:58:22PM CET:
> > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:46:06PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry I did not answer before.
No problem of course.
In the meantime I did come up with some p
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:46:06PM CEST:
>>
>> I'll follow up on automake-patches with a patch to test.
> Here we go. WDYT?
Hi Ralf,
Sorry I did not answer before.
In other projects I'm involved in we store