Found it :)
Did a test with a few other servers and two other servers with 630k
files took only 35 seconds to build the tree, so it was a specified
problem with our "erp"-server.
We found that the problem was with a lot af sequential files (000 -
XXX) that this server holds:
[erp]jvc> fin
rom: "Kern Sibbald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Reinier Haasjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "Thomas Simmons"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long t
Hello,
I just did a "restore" on a 400MHz PII with 250MB main memory that was in the
process of completing my nightly backups. That is to say, it was pretty busy
already.
From the restore command until the tree prompt it took 1 minute 43 seconds.
This was for something like 475,000 files.
Hi all,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> To answer your question, you will need to do some timing. See below.
>
> On Monday 08 August 2005 09:37, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
>
>>Hi, sorry for the late reply, weekend.
>>
>>I did the test again like you did it (with the time command) and the
>>result is as follo
ier Haasjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "bacula-users"
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time
Hi, sorry for the late reply, weeken
To answer your question, you will need to do some timing. See below.
On Monday 08 August 2005 09:37, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
> Hi, sorry for the late reply, weekend.
>
> I did the test again like you did it (with the time command) and the
> result is as follow:
>
> -bash-2.05b$ time echo "restore
Hi, sorry for the late reply, weekend.
I did the test again like you did it (with the time command) and the
result is as follow:
-bash-2.05b$ time echo "restore jobid=1553,1561,1576,1598,1607,1617"
|bconsole
Connecting to Director tapeserver:9101
1000 OK: tapeserver-dir Version: 1.37.30 (14 July
That seems pretty slow to me. I just did a test and it took 10 seconds
to build the tree for ~400,000 files. Like you, I too have an opteron
system, a dual 246 w 1/GB ram, however I keep the database on a set of
mirrored sata disks on the local server. Have you tried installing the
database on
I was just thinking. With my setup. The new bacula
server is an Opteron 246 server with 4GB of memory and
the database is running on an Athlon 2400 with only
256 MB of memory and it takes (1 to 3) minutes to get
the file list for around 10,000 files with version
1.36.3 and a postgresql database. Th
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I
> > decided to test a full server recovery.
> > I discovered that the building the directory tree
> > takes a very long time (almost an hour) for
> 429,836
> > files.
> > I started the building of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I
>>decided to test a full server recovery.
>>I discovered that the building the directory tree
>>takes a very long time (almost an hour) for 429,836
>>files.
>>I started the building of the tree at 11:20 and at
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I
> decided to test a full server recovery.
> I discovered that the building the directory tree
> takes a very long time (almost an hour) for 429,836
> files.
> I started the building of the tree at 11:20 and at
> 12:15 I got a prompt.
>
Hi,
I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I decided to test a full server
recovery.
I discovered that the building the directory tree takes a very long time
(almost an hour) for 429,836 files.
I started the building of the tree at 11:20 and at 12:15 I got a prompt.
The machine is a d
13 matches
Mail list logo
