[Bacula-users] FileDaemon vs manual transfer

2005-12-12 Thread Florian Daniel Otel
Hello all, I have the following robustness-related question: I am deploying bacula as a multi-site backup soultion, where a central tape storage gets relatively large quantities of data (aprox 20 GBytes per day) from multiple sites via net links of dubious reliability. I am considering two pos

Re: [Bacula-users] FileDaemon vs manual transfer

2005-12-12 Thread Ferdinando Pasqualetti
20 Gb is a small amount of data. I would suggest to use rsync to get a local copy of data (using compression, and other features), and than copy data on tape, hopefully with bacula. -- Ferdinando Pasqualetti G.T.Dati srl Tel.

Re: [Bacula-users] FileDaemon vs manual transfer

2005-12-14 Thread Ferdinando Pasqualetti
-- Ferdinando Pasqualetti G.T.Dati srl Tel. 0557310862 - 3356172731 - Fax 055720143 Florian Daniel Otel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/12/2005 09.28.11: > On 12/13/05, Ferdinando Pasqualetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >