Hi all,
I'm currently implementing a new bacula server running on a new dual
core/dual cpu Dell PowerEdge 2900 server into a Dell Powervault 136T
with a LTO-2 drive (IBM Ultrium-td2 model). The tape drive and robot
are on a dedicated Adaptec 29160 card. The OS is OpenSuse 10.2
I think I shou
El mar, 10-07-2007 a las 10:31 -0400, Bob Hetzel escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently implementing a new bacula server running on a new dual
> core/dual cpu Dell PowerEdge 2900 server into a Dell Powervault 136T
> with a LTO-2 drive (IBM Ultrium-td2 model). The tape drive and robot
> are on a
I'm interested too, I've an HP LTO-2 and bacula says that gets 1,5
MB/sec ( for both backup clients, local and remote )
I'm not an average user of scsi tape devices, any tip will be very
wellcome :)
These numbers are highly dependent on the backup type (full, incremental
...) and the ability
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Drescher wrote:
>> I'm interested too, I've an HP LTO-2 and bacula says that gets 1,5
>> MB/sec ( for both backup clients, local and remote )
>>
>> I'm not an average user of scsi tape devices, any tip will be very
>> wellcome :)
>
> These numbers are highly dependent
It was suggested that perhaps my 50 GB/hr data rate was due to the
client maxing out around that rate. I believe I have verified this.
Previously I had been used to seeing much higher rates on another backup
system, but I was only backing up servers using high performance SCSI
disks, RAIDed t
Bob Hetzel wrote:
> I installed the bacula client on one of those servers, where I saw a
> backup rate of about 77 GB/hr (21375.8 KB/s as reported by bacula).
>
That's what I get using LTO-3 drives, so that sounds pretty good to me
for LTO-2.
Michael
--
The music business is a cruel and sh
