Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes without effect

2017-03-03 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Friday 2017-03-03 16:22:01 Marian Neubert wrote: > Hi all, > > i'm facing an issue with an setup, where Maximum Volume Bytes seems to > have no effect at all. > The Pool RemoteFile has only one Volume Remote-0009 with current size of > nearly 1TB, Status "Append". But the total Byte Size

[Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes without effect

2017-03-03 Thread Marian Neubert
Hi all, i'm facing an issue with an setup, where Maximum Volume Bytes seems to have no effect at all. The Pool RemoteFile has only one Volume Remote-0009 with current size of nearly 1TB, Status "Append". But the total Byte Size (usage) ist only about 300GB. Could you give me a hint, whats

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes

2011-05-24 Thread ewan.brown
Subject: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes Hi All, I'm currently setting up a disk-based storage pool in Bacula and am wondering what I should set Maximum Volume Bytes to. I was thinking of setting it to 100G, but am just wondering if this is sane. FYI, the total data of our clients

[Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes

2011-05-20 Thread Mike Seda
Hi All, I'm currently setting up a disk-based storage pool in Bacula and am wondering what I should set Maximum Volume Bytes to. I was thinking of setting it to 100G, but am just wondering if this is sane. FYI, the total data of our clients is 15 TB, but we are told that this data should at

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes

2011-05-20 Thread Mike Seda
All, Nevermind about dedup with Bacula. It seems that the current block format doesn't work too well with it: http://changelog.complete.org/archives/5547-research-on-deduplicating-disk-based-and-cloud-backups I'm getting descent compression rates though with LZJB (compression=on), which makes

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes

2011-05-20 Thread Dennis Hoppe
Hello Mike, Am 20.05.2011 19:48, schrieb Mike Seda: I'm currently setting up a disk-based storage pool in Bacula and am wondering what I should set Maximum Volume Bytes to. I was thinking of setting it to 100G, but am just wondering if this is sane. i think you should use the parameter

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes

2011-05-20 Thread John Drescher
Am 20.05.2011 19:48, schrieb Mike Seda: I'm currently setting up a disk-based storage pool in Bacula and am wondering what I should set Maximum Volume Bytes to. I was thinking of setting it to 100G, but am just wondering if this is sane. I think 100G will be fine. The size depends on your

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes

2011-05-20 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/20/11 13:48, Mike Seda wrote: Hi All, I'm currently setting up a disk-based storage pool in Bacula and am wondering what I should set Maximum Volume Bytes to. I was thinking of setting it to 100G, but am just wondering if this is sane. It depends. There are various ways to control

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Volume Bytes

2011-05-20 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/20/11 14:38, Mike Seda wrote: All, Nevermind about dedup with Bacula. It seems that the current block format doesn't work too well with it: http://changelog.complete.org/archives/5547-research-on-deduplicating-disk-based-and-cloud-backups I'm getting descent compression rates though