Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Jorge, Looks good to me. For D flag as mentioned, we have to explicitly state support/not support for all existing (RFCed or almost RFC

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Andre Burdet (lburdet) ; Luc André Burdet ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Luc, Sounds good, we are in synch then. Stephane, hope you are goo

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

...@gmail.com Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Jorge, Sorry for the imprecise language, this was indeed about Highest-Preference vs. Lowest-Preference algo. Seems we can

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

ot; , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Luc, Thanks for your email. A few comments: 1. You mention the lowest-ip vs highest-ip debate, but I don’t think there is any debate about the PE’

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

2021 at 2:42 PM To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) , slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Jorge, Stéphane, Satya and I have gone over

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

el: +1 613 254 4814 From: Luc André Burdet Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 at 14:05 To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" , "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org" , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.o

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Stéphane, Jorge, On the issue of tie-breaking, I would agree with Stéphane. It is too easy for peering PEs to be misconfigured / in disagreeme

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Stéphane, Jorge, On the issue of tie-breaking, I would agree with Stéphane. It is too easy for peering PEs to be misconfigured / in disagreement as to Hi or Lo and this should be signaled if at least in an error reporting capacity. I would propose to go even further. This DF Election algo

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Stephane, Please see in-line with [jorge2]. Thank you! Jorge From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Date: Monday, August 31, 2020 at 11:49 AM To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) , draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: Shepherd's Review o

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Jorge, Please find additional feedback inline. (Stripping things we agree on) Stephane From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: vendredi 19 juin 2020 20:37 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subj

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Stephane, Thanks for the review and my apologies for the delay. We just posted a new revision. As usual, very good points. Please see in-line. Thx Jorge From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 3:20 PM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org" , 'BESS' Cc: "

[bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Authors, Here is my review of the document: Please look at the nits and fix them. https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft -ietf-bess-ev