> On 1. 1. 2024, at 15:19, r1wcp...@bbqporkmccity.com wrote:
>
> Thank you very much, I was unaware of the HTTP/2 requirement and was assuming
> it is a bug. Is there any reason for omitting the HTTP/1.1 upgrade part of
> the protocol?
It would be additional complexity that's really not needed
Hello,
Thank you very much, I was unaware of the HTTP/2 requirement and was
assuming it is a bug. Is there any reason for omitting the HTTP/1.1
upgrade part of the protocol?
On 2024/01/01 22:30, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi,
BIND 9 DoH implementation always uses HTTP/2, so you
can't talk to it vi
Hi,
BIND 9 DoH implementation always uses HTTP/2, so you
can't talk to it via HTTP/0.9, so your proxy balancer needs
to talk HTTP/2.
curl --http2-prior-knowledge -v -H 'accept: application/dns-message'
'http://172.23.0.2:80/dns-query?dns=AAABAAABA3d3dwdleGFtcGxlA2NvbQAAAQAB'
should work
Hello,
Hope you are having a great day.
I am trying to setup a BIND9 DNS over HTTP (DoH but in plain HTTP)
server with the ubuntu/bind9:latest docker image behind a HTTPS load
balancer however I am unable to perform any DNS query with the newly
installed BIND9 server(not through the load bala
4 matches
Mail list logo