Hi Tobias,
In answer to your questions...
"Isn't your suggestion already covered by BIP39 since there is not
restriction in how you choose your passphrase?"
- Correct, my idea is covered by BIP39, and therefore compatible with
BIP39... I see the 'quantum' passphrase as an optional 'soft fork' le
Thank you for your reply Tobias,
I don't think that the chicken-egg scenario is relevant, but please let me
explain why:
Wallet A = seed words (A) - add minimal funds as a canary/sacrificial wallet
Wallet B = seed words (B) - add minimal funds as a canary/sacrificial wallet
Wallet AB = seed wor
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your thoughts.
Unfortunately, your analysis is incorrect.
This is a non-destructive adaptation of the BIP39 standard, and is
certainly not "rolling your own security".
The 'quantum' passphrase is relying on the well established security of the
existing BIP39 standard.
T
Hi Chris,
I apologise if I did not make it clear enough, but the 24 seed words used
to make the quantum passphrase are separate, newly generated 24 seed words,
and not the same as those for the main wallet.
With both layers (seed words + quantum passphrase) the security provided is
(2048^23)^(204
