> > * If the top item on the stack is not a minimally encoded `OP_0`, `OP_1`,
> or
> `OP_2`; succeed immediately[^2].
>
> I presume this was supposed to go to OP_4 now.
Fixed, thanks!
> > ### How does the efficiency compare to [bip118][]?
>
> Just noting BIP118 also allows pubkey of "1" to
Quick update to the proposal thanks to James O'Beirne: CTV is 2-bytes
less expensive than I thought when used alone. I thought that script
success required exactly OP_TRUE not just a CastToBool()=true value on
the stack.
This means that my proposal is 2 weight units (0.5vBytes) larger than
CTV
Hi Brandon,
Not going to dive too deep here, just adding a bit of color.
> * If the top item on the stack is not a minimally encoded `OP_0`, `OP_1`,
or
`OP_2`; succeed immediately[^2].
I presume this was supposed to go to OP_4 now.
> ### How does the efficiency compare to [bip118][]?
Just
Hi list,
https://gist.github.com/reardencode/2aa98700b720174598d21989dd46e781
I'm seeking feedback on this proposal to provide the functionality
requested by those advocating for bip118 and bip119 in a combined way
that retains the low risk associated with each of those separate
proposals. At
