On 02/26/2015 12:14 PM, Oleg Andreev wrote:
>
>> Base43 is the same as any BaseX standard, but using a different alphabet
>> (43 characters). It's meant to be used for efficiently storing binary
>> data into QR codes. The alphabet is picked to match the 'Alphanumeric'
>> input mode of QR codes as
> Base43 is the same as any BaseX standard, but using a different alphabet
> (43 characters). It's meant to be used for efficiently storing binary
> data into QR codes. The alphabet is picked to match the 'Alphanumeric'
> input mode of QR codes as closely as possible, but at the same time be
> all
Thanks for references. Yeah, I don't need X509 signing (if I could use
certificates, I wouldn't need to include PR in the URL in the first place).
I presume you used "BITCOIN:-" instead of
"bitcoin:?r=somescheme://" to make it more compact.
I also tried to look up Base43, but I could not find
Yeah, you'd be limited to simple usecases. X509 signing or lots of
outputs will make the QR code hard to scan. However, if all you want to
do is send to a custom script (without using P2SH) I invite you to have
a look at
https://github.com/schildbach/bitcoin-wallet/blob/master/wallet/src/de/schild
Andreas' wallet supports this, but don't do it. Payment requests can get
larger in future even without signing. Exploding the capacity of a QR code
is very easy.
Instead, take a look at the Bluetooth/NFC discussion happening in a
different thread.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Oleg Andreev wr
5 matches
Mail list logo
