DJ Lucas wrote:
> 1.1.5 will be out shortly. The current 1.1.4 patches apply to the RC
For anyone interested...1.1.5 is moving quickly
http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/openoffice/contrib/rc/1.1.5rc2/OOo_1.1.5rc2_src.tar.gz
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 07/21/05 14:08 CST:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 07/20/05 00:50 CST:
>>On 7/10/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Now that LFS 6.1 has been released, we need to develop a strategy for
>>>the release of BLFS 6.1. Right now there are 52 ou
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/21/05 16:57 CST:
> It will always be incomplete is moe sense. :)
No Bruce, it's mo', not moe.
As in, I need some mo' money.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At this point, with the work Manuel did and all the other Editors
> providing additional descriptions and what-not to the Indexing of
> the book, I think we can safely remove the "This is incomplete ..."
> part at the beginning of the Index.
It will always be i
Hi all,
At this point, with the work Manuel did and all the other Editors
providing additional descriptions and what-not to the Indexing of
the book, I think we can safely remove the "This is incomplete ..."
part at the beginning of the Index.
Does anyone feel that we shouldn't at this point?
--
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 07/20/05 00:50 CST:
> On 7/10/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Now that LFS 6.1 has been released, we need to develop a strategy for
>>the release of BLFS 6.1. Right now there are 52 outstanding bugs.
>
> Down to 42.
And back up to 77 after go
On 7/21/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > Which version of freeglut did you test? I could compile freeglut-2.4.0
> > without any problems.
> >
>
> freeglut-2.4.0
>
> Did you compile xorg or XFree86? I built XFree86-4.5.0
xorg.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mai
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Which version of freeglut did you test? I could compile freeglut-2.4.0
without any problems.
freeglut-2.4.0
Did you compile xorg or XFree86? I built XFree86-4.5.0
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.htm
On 7/21/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > The error that you are getting has nothing to do with X being
> > installed in /usr. I think one of the libraries that freeglut links
> > against is not linked to libpthread.
> >
>
> Hmm...if I put the line
> #defin
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
The error that you are getting has nothing to do with X being
installed in /usr. I think one of the libraries that freeglut links
against is not linked to libpthread.
Hmm...if I put the line
#define ProjectRoot /usr
in my host.def file then X installs in /usr and Freegl
On 7/21/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Jordan wrote:
> > The compile line doesn't seem to be pulling in pthreads with -pthread
> > or -lpthread.
> >
>
> Indeed. I had even worked that out for myself. The solution was to simply
>
> export LDFLAGS=-lpthread
>
> The odd thing
Randy McMurchy wrote:
As far as /usr/X11R6, there are *so* many packages out there
that expect X to be there that BLFS would have to create a
symlink to avoid breakages.
I've found that freeglut is the only BLFS package that has a problem with
XFree86 installed in /usr. One other (non-BLFS) pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
