Re: nfs-utils

2010-11-01 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:55 AM, treah blade wrote: > I am unsure if anyone has been keeping an eye on this package as it is really > a require package if you will be using nfs at all in your system. The version > that currently is in blfs is 1.1.4 which at this point is over 2 years old > and n

Re: alsa-1.0.23

2010-11-27 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > treah blade wrote: > >> >> Tho I am not sure why a kernel driver would be calling a shared >> library you never know. You could try building the driver from the >> same series and omit the driver that gets loaded with the kernel as a >> test t

Re: alsa-1.0.23

2010-11-28 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Stuart Stegall wrote these words on 11/27/10 15:22 CST: > >> I believe in general you need to have the same alsa-driver version as >> the alsa-utils and alsa-lib. > > That has never been the case in the past. Eve

Re: Pulseaudio

2010-12-03 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:16 AM, treah blade wrote: > I wasent sure if anyone was considering includeing this into the blfs book or > not but I was curious if anyone has gotten it working well on a LFS system > lately?  Reason I ask is it seams to be all the rage around the distros and I > was c

Re: Pulseaudio

2010-12-03 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Stuart Stegall wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:16 AM, treah blade wrote: >> I wasent sure if anyone was considering includeing this into the blfs book >> or not but I was curious if anyone has gotten it working well on a LFS >> system lat

Re: Boost building

2011-03-11 Thread Stuart Stegall
Boost library naming is slightly more complicated that even that ... http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_0/more/getting_started/unix-variants.html#library-naming Thanks, Stuart -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe:

[blfs-dev] PyGObject

2012-04-06 Thread Stuart Stegall
I have found that the current version of PyGObject requires PyCairo and can optionally use libffi. Py2cairo is actually listed on the old version of PyGObject. Go n-éirí leat, Stuart -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsub

Re: [blfs-dev] PyGObject

2012-04-06 Thread Stuart Stegall
f install Hopefully this is the correct list for these corrections. Go n-éirí leat, Stuart On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Stuart Stegall wrote: > I have found that the current version of PyGObject requires PyCairo > and can optionally use libffi.  Py2cairo is actually listed on the ol

Re: [blfs-dev] PyGObject

2012-04-06 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Armin K. wrote: > On 04/06/2012 05:35 PM, Stuart Stegall wrote: >> I have found that the current version of PyGObject requires PyCairo >> and can optionally use libffi.  Py2cairo is actually listed on the old >> version of PyGObject.

Re: [blfs-dev] PyGObject

2012-04-06 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Armin K. wrote: > On 04/06/2012 05:49 PM, Stuart Stegall wrote: >> Another update - apparently it's "complicated" ... >> >>> From the Python Modules BLFS page: PyGObject-3.0.3 provides Python 3 >> bindings to the GObje