The code is all in for M97
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:30 Joe Medley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In which version of Chrome do you expect to ship?
>
> Joe
> Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com |
> 816-678-7195
> *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.*
>
>
> On Thu, Oct
Hi,
In which version of Chrome do you expect to ship?
Joe
Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com |
816-678-7195
*If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.*
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:37 PM Alex Russell
wrote:
> LGTM3.
>
> In future, if you assert a TAG review is
LGTM3.
In future, if you assert a TAG review isn't necessary, please provide links
to previous reviews that cover the same space.
On Thursday, October 21, 2021 at 12:17:45 PM UTC-7 Manuel Rego wrote:
> LGTM2
>
> On 21/10/2021 21:16, Daniel Bratell wrote:
> > LGTM1
> >
> > /Daniel
> >
> > On F
LGTM2
On 21/10/2021 21:16, Daniel Bratell wrote:
> LGTM1
>
> /Daniel
>
> On Friday, 15 October 2021 at 14:41:44 UTC+2 ari...@chromium.org wrote:
>
> Correct, they’ll behave the same as the other non-legacy hints.
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:34 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
> Thanks
LGTM1
/Daniel
On Friday, 15 October 2021 at 14:41:44 UTC+2 ari...@chromium.org wrote:
> Correct, they’ll behave the same as the other non-legacy hints.
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:34 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>> Thanks for working on this, Ari!
>>
>> IIUC, this intent will add these new hint names
Correct, they’ll behave the same as the other non-legacy hints.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:34 Yoav Weiss wrote:
> Thanks for working on this, Ari!
>
> IIUC, this intent will add these new hint names, but would also ensure
> their behavior when it comes to 3P delegation would be different from th
Thanks for working on this, Ari!
IIUC, this intent will add these new hint names, but would also ensure
their behavior when it comes to 3P delegation would be different from the
legacy hints (as they don't have the same legacy baggage). Is that correct?
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:09 PM Ari Chivuk
