Gennaro Prota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:08:40 -0500, David Abrahams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I basically agree with everything you've said, especially about the
>>separate traits (metafunctions)! I was just pointing out some overlap
>>with existing libraries.
>
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:08:40 -0500, David Abrahams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I basically agree with everything you've said, especially about the
>separate traits (metafunctions)! I was just pointing out some overlap
>with existing libraries.
Ok, here's what I propose:
a) cleaning up the whole
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 01:40:45 -0500, David Abrahams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gennaro Prota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> the attached files contain a bunch of trivial stuff related to
>> integral types that I need in a lot of situations. Any interest for
>> inclusion into
