Open GitHub Pull Requests
=
IssueComponentUser Updated Title
--- --- - --
--
#1 [1] broccoli dcode [2] 2013-08-12 Updated specfile. Works under mock
for EL6 [3]
[1] P
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13815#comment-13815
]
Matthias Vallentin commented on BIT-1016:
-
{quote}
But also, I don't think we have any
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robin Sommer updated BIT-1068:
--
Resolution: Merged (was: Fixed)
Status: Closed (was: Merge Request)
> pin_cpus error mes
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13814#comment-13814
]
Jon Siwek commented on BIT-1016:
{quote}I wonder if we'd ever need more than 128-bit. I'm not a
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13813#comment-13813
]
Matthias Vallentin commented on BIT-1016:
-
{quote}
This is kind of what currently happe
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robin Sommer updated BIT-1069:
--
Resolution: Merged (was: Fixed)
Status: Closed (was: Merge Request)
> merge topic/bernha
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13812#comment-13812
]
Jon Siwek commented on BIT-1016:
{quote}
Regarding performance: another option would be to use
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13811#comment-13811
]
Robin Sommer commented on BIT-1016:
---
I like that idea. Storage-wise it's 2x64 bit anyways.
R
I like that idea. Storage-wise it's 2x64 bit anyways.
Robin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 16:04 -0500, you wrote:
> Regarding performance: another option would be to use 128-bit UUIDs
> internally and just chop of 32 bytes if a 96-bit UUID is desired,
> assuming the bits in the UUID are distributed un
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13810#comment-13810
]
Matthias Vallentin commented on BIT-1016:
-
Regarding performance: another option would
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13809#comment-13809
]
Jon Siwek commented on BIT-1016:
{quote}while I generally like the bits_per_uid option, I'm won
On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Robin Sommer (JIRA)
wrote:
> - We could use "C-" instead of "C" to make it more obvious that the
> first character is special. But not sure if it's worth it.
FWIW, I prefer C for the simple reason that if I double-click it, it
selects the whole uid (including the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 20:35 +, you wrote:
> FWIW, I prefer C for the simple reason that if I double-click it,
> it selects the whole uid (including the C), and I can then copy the
> whole thing.
Good point.
Robin
--
Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510) 722-6541 * ro...@icir.org
ICSI/LBNL
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13808#comment-13808
]
Robin Sommer commented on BIT-1016:
---
Good point.
Robin
--
Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13806#comment-13806
]
Robin Sommer commented on BIT-1068:
---
Is the "true" here intentional?
{code}
[…]
# me
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13807#comment-13807
]
Daniel Thayer commented on BIT-1068:
Yes, it was intentional. Without that check, then if
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robin Sommer reassigned BIT-1016:
-
Assignee: Jon Siwek
> Option to extend uids to 128 bit
>
>
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13804#comment-13804
]
Robin Sommer commented on BIT-1016:
---
Merged. Three comments:
- while I generally like the b
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robin Sommer updated BIT-1016:
--
Status: Open (was: Merge Request)
> Option to extend uids to 128 bit
> --
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13805#comment-13805
]
Adam Slagell commented on BIT-1016:
---
C- probably doesn't matter. They could treat it as part
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernhard Amann updated BIT-1069:
Status: Merge Request (was: Open)
> merge topic/bernhard/hexstr
> ---
Bernhard Amann created BIT-1069:
---
Summary: merge topic/bernhard/hexstr
Key: BIT-1069
URL: https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1069
Project: Bro Issue Tracker
Issue Type: New Feature
Open Merge Requests
===
IDComponentReporterAssignee Updated For Version
PrioritySummary
--- -- - -- -
--
BIT-1068 [1] BroControl S
23 matches
Mail list logo
