Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the 2.59 shell selection algorithm would probably(?) have selected
> /bin/sh as shell, whereas, due to changes we did because of OSF,
> /usr/bin/posix/sh is preferred now.
Ouch. Good catch.
> I hope we get away with this.
I don't think we will, sin
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Pleas try again with /usr/bin/posix/sh as shell; that's what the shell
> > > selection algorithm of 2.59c will select.
> >
> > Yes that fails. /usr/bin/posix/sh is a symbolic link to /u95/bin/sh which
> > is hard linked to /u95/bin/ksh. /usr/bin/k
Hello,
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:33:42PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> you are so bright, Ralf!
this doesn't sound nice, I'm afraid.
I wanted to say that it was realy clever to notice that
> > | s,^\([ ]*#[]*\)[^ ]*\([ ][ ]*HAVE_DECL_STPCPY\)[
> > (].*$,\1define\2 0 ,
> > | H
Hello,
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> | s,^\([ ]*#[]*\)[^ ]*\([ ][ ]*HAVE_DECL_NANOSLEEP\)[
> (].*$,\1define\2 0 ,
> | s,^\([ ]*#[]*\)[^ ]*\([ ][ ]*HAVE_DECL_REALLOC\)[
> (].*$,\1define\2 1 ,
> | s,^\([ ]*#[
[ Cc:ing bug-autoconf again ]
* Tim Rice wrote on Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:13:34AM CEST:
> On Mon, 22 May 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > > Next I tried
> > > CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh /bin/sh \
> > > /opt/src/gnu/coreutils-5.95/configure \
> > > CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh
> > > Again a val
[ better keep the debian bug address in Cc: ]
* Ben Pfaff wrote on Tue, May 23, 2006 at 01:34:18AM CEST:
>
> The "configure" script from the CVS autoconf did report warnings
> for the lack of datarootdir. This appears to be harmless. The
> two versions of "configure" generated identical config.
