[Bug ld/2613] testcase for binutils:ld on alpha fails.

2006-09-05 Thread tomri at gmx dot net
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED GCC target triplet||alpha http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer

2006-09-05 Thread tomri at gmx dot net
-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED GCC target triplet||alpha http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer

2006-09-05 Thread tomri at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From tomri at gmx dot net 2006-09-05 21:10 --- Created an attachment (id=1283) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1283&action=view) testcase for readelf -a bug. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3146 --- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer

2006-09-05 Thread tomri at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From tomri at gmx dot net 2006-09-05 21:05 --- Hi Nick I found this bug by building the prelink package from FC5 and running the "make check" in ./testsuite" I looks like the new prelink ísn't ok on alpha. However: - glibc - gcc4.xx aren't so much supported on alp

[Bug binutils/3171] efi-app-ia64 objcopy magic error

2006-09-05 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-05 18:57 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-09/msg00022.html -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug ld/3149] ld 2.17 bug ( relocation R_X86_64_PC32 )

2006-09-05 Thread aliens_predator at inbox dot ru
--- Additional Comments From aliens_predator at inbox dot ru 2006-09-05 17:15 --- ok. Thanks for help but I solve problem. gcc add to the asm intruction GOTPCREL! -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug ld/3149] ld 2.17 bug ( relocation R_X86_64_PC32 )

2006-09-05 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-05 16:29 --- You can write a similar function in C and use "gcc -S -O2 -fPIC" to see how gcc generates PIC output. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug ld/3015] -z relro may create PT_NULL segment

2006-09-05 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-05 16:27 --- Fixed for Linux/ia64 and Linux/hppa. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug ld/3015] -z relro may create PT_NULL segment

2006-09-05 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-05 16:26 --- Fixed. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3015 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug gas/3172] iwmmxt control registers not hanlded correctly

2006-09-05 Thread dr dot tomas at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From dr dot tomas at yahoo dot co dot uk 2006-09-05 15:48 --- Created an attachment (id=1282) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1282&action=view) Patch to accept wCg registers for wC-type instructions. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug gas/3172] New: iwmmxt control registers not hanlded correctly

2006-09-05 Thread dr dot tomas at yahoo dot co dot uk
The iwmmx general control registers wCg are a subclass of the control registers wC, so that any instruction which can take wC can also use wCg; the current code in config/tc-arm.c does not handle this. (patch to follow) -- Summary: iwmmxt control registers not hanlded correctly

[Bug admin/3165] Installation of clearcase

2006-09-05 Thread drow at sources dot redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-09-05 13:00 --- Hi Vipin, I have no idea why you reported this as a binutils bug. This is a bug tracker for GNU binutils only; please ask this question on an IBM or Red Hat mailing list instead. -- What

[Bug admin/3165] Installation of clearcase

2006-09-05 Thread singhal_vipin at rediffmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From singhal_vipin at rediffmail dot com 2006-09-05 12:27 --- Please suggest -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |A

[Bug binutils/3166] --only-keep-debug doesn't work on .o files with group

2006-09-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-05 08:24 --- Hi Guys, I have checked in the patch, as well as an update to the documentation specifiying that the --only-keep-debug switch is only intended to be used on fully linked files. (I could not see any reasonable w