--- Additional Comments From mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2008-10-25 09:41
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Nick,
I've tested your patch and it fixes both the two test cases I posted and the
original application where I first noticed the bug. Thanks.
/Mikael
--
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-25 09:54
---
Hi Mikael,
Ok, I have checked the patch in along with this changelog entry.
Cheers
Nick
ld/ChangeLog
2008-10-25 Nick Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR 6945
* ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1):
Hi Surbhi,
.section test
.quad 1f
.quad 2f
1:{
nop 0x0
nop 0x0
nop 0x0
}
2:{
nop 0x0
nop 0x0
nop 0x0
}
.previous
When I try to assemble this test using an ia64 assembler built from the
current mainline binutils sources I get two error
Hi Surbhi,
Here is a easier pointer to the bug1:
I am not an IA64 expert, but I took a look at this problem.
.macro emul_ptr_i pr=p0,va,sz
.section test, a, progbits
(\pr) ptr.i \va,\sz
.previous
(\pr) ptr.i \va,\sz
.endm
nop.m 0x0
emul_ptr_i p1, r1, r2
Comment :
Hello,
arguments = *(int*) clientData;
Gets strict aliasing warning that escalate to error and fails build.
Attached a simple temp fix against head.
Thanks!
--
Summary: gdb/gdbtk/generic/gdbtk-stack.c - fail due to strict
aliasing
Product: binutils
--- Additional Comments From alon dot barlev at gmail dot com 2008-10-25
22:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=3025)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3025action=view)
binutils-cvs-gdbtk-stack-strict-aliasing.patch
--
Hello,
The build environment has the capacity to use in-tree tcl.
The sid/component/tcl is able to use this tcl, it does this by modifying the
CPPFLAGS in its autoconf.
The problem is that the outer build environment overrides the CPPFLAGS with
something else and put it into the environment,
--- Additional Comments From alon dot barlev at gmail dot com 2008-10-25
22:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=3026)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3026action=view)
binutils-cvs-sid-tcl-build.patch
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6987
---
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-10-25 22:53 ---
Neither gdb nor gdbtk are part of binutils. And the patch is as broken as the
original code, it still fails on big-endian 64-bit architectures. Please
report that to the insight mailinglist.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From alon dot barlev at gmail dot com 2008-10-25
23:19 ---
Sorry...
So what is it doing in the tree?
Sent a message [1].
Thank you.
[1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/insight/2008-q4/msg6.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6986
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
