--- Additional Comments From xenofears at gmail dot com 2009-07-31 03:45
---
Well, trying an old version doesn't really answer the question, it could still
be in gcc's field or binutils causing a bug in gcc to surface.
I would very much appreciate if Binutils could release numbered sna
Please read this bug report I submitted to GCC:
One day, I built gcc 4.4.1 prerelease, with normal multilib. The next day, I
realized I forgot to add Ada, and all of a sudden multilib failed with the
exact same configuration. At the time, I didn't think too much of it and don't
remember if anyt
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-31
02:50 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
>
> Comment #3 says the only difference between good and bad binaries was a
> .rela.plt relocation. That would seem to indicate that the relocation is
> being
> written once with
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-07-31
01:03 ---
bed->need_finish_dynamic_ifunc_symbol is unacceptable in my opinion.
Comment #3 says the only difference between good and bad binaries was a
.rela.plt relocation. That would seem to indicate that the rel
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-30
16:50 ---
If all relocations against an IFUNC symbol are in the same file
where it is defined, the ref_regular field may not be set. I
changed the x86 linker to set it properly for IFUNC symbols. We
need to do it. Oth
