[Bug ld/10955] Invalid LTOFF22X -> GPREL22 relaxation

2009-11-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-18 01:36 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/10955] Invalid LTOFF22X -> GPREL22 relaxation

2009-11-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-17 22:31 --- Subject: Bug 10955 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2009-11-17 22:31:41 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elfxx-ia64.c Log message:

[Bug ld/10955] Invalid LTOFF22X -> GPREL22 relaxation

2009-11-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-17 20:57 --- Subject: Bug 10955 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2009-11-17 20:57:22 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elfxx-ia64.c Log message:

[Bug ld/10955] Invalid LTOFF22X -> GPREL22 relaxation

2009-11-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-17 19:22 --- Subject: Bug 10955 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2009-11-17 19:21:53 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elfxx-ia64.c Log message:

[Bug ld/10955] Invalid LTOFF22X -> GPREL22 relaxation

2009-11-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-17 18:39 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-11/msg00330.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10955 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-17 Thread chris at seberino dot org
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-11-17 17:57 --- Subject: Re: Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 05:25:50PM -, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > Right - I have checked in the newly uploaded pr10924_arm_d

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-17 17:25 --- Hi Chris, Right - I have checked in the newly uploaded pr10924_arm_dis.c_patch.2 which handles all of the new test cases you found. With regard to the TSTP instruction, it is a real instruction, but an obsole

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-17 17:22 --- Created an attachment (id=4392) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4392&action=view) More fixes -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-17 17:20 --- Subject: Bug 10924 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-11-17 17:20:26 Modified files: gas/testsuite : ChangeLog gas/testsuite/gas/

[Bug binutils/10973] OP_E_memory produces wrong disassembled code

2009-11-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-17 17:07 --- Another pattern that objdump does not get right (probably due to OP_E_memory again) is: vfmaddpd %xmm1,(%ecx,%edi),%xmm6,%xmm4 disassembled like this: 0: 67 addr32

[Bug binutils/10973] New: OP_E_memory produces wrong disassembled code

2009-11-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
The following patterns are not disassembled correctly for the registers (rbp, rsp, r12, r13) and for any of the instructions of FMA4 or XOP with four operands. vfmaddpd %xmm10,(%rbp),%xmm5,%xmm11 vfmaddpd %xmm10,(%rsp),%xmm5,%xmm11 VPMACSDD %xmm10,(%r12),%