Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> unarchive 23273
> forcemerge 23273 26377
> close 26377
> stop
FYI the above had no effect because you did not (b)cc the control server.
(I feel like I see this happen fairly often on coreutils issues.)
Hi,
Please don't report bugs via bcc, else they end up assigned to the wrong
package. I've reassigned this to coreutils and am sending this mail so
it appears on the bug-coreutils list.
y-i...@secom.co.jp wrote:
> Hello, coreutils maintainers.
>
> Command expr in version 8.25 of coreutils
You mailed submit@debbugs without specifying a Package:, so your bug
report ended up on the help-debbugs list. I have reassigned it to
coreutils. (Please note there is no wc package.)
(My mailer is messing up the UTF-8 characters in your report.
Interested parties can see the original at
Please keep the debbugs address cc'd.
Max Rottenkolber wrote (on Sat, 1 Jun 2013 at 10:22 +0200):
M-x customize-face RET font-lock-doc-face RET
Find file foo .lisp, enter:
(defun ()
redish
13)
Surely this defun is missing a name?
(defvar *x* nil
whatever you set doc-face to.)
Sorry coreutils, I sent my previous message to the wrong bug number by
mistake.
I expect this to be futile, but here goes:
Since bug-coreutils also uses a debbugs installation, please do not
cross-post bug reports between submit@bugs.debian and bug-coreutils.
The package: etc stuff is parsed by both systems, and it is
impossible for it to work right if two are involved.
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
I see this upon search at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=jidannisubmit=Search!max=20result=normalsort=date:late
bug-coreutils does not appear anywhere in that URL.
You have to specify _which_ list to search.
Visiting
This bug was reported via bcc. Because of this, the bug tracking system
did not know which package it was associated with and assigned it to
debbugs.gnu.org. I have reassigned it to the coreutils package and am
sending this so that the bug-coreutils mailing list sees the report.
See the complete
[ The following went to the help-debbugs list, I think because putting
a space before the ':' in the pseudo-headers does not work. I am
resending it so that it goes to the bug-coreutils list. Note that
Command and Type are not recognized pseudo-headers. You don't need
to worry about any of this,
Hi,
The following message got resent to bug-gnu-emacs rather than
bug-coreutils, because debbugs got confused.
We can discuss the reasons on help-debbugs if anyone is interested.
(Short answer: it looks like the mail you sent had two separate To:
headers, and a changed Subject: header with no
reassign 5789 debbugs.gnu.org
retitle 5789 there is a single mailing list for control messages
severity 5789 minor
stop
Bob Proulx wrote:
The debbugs automated reply message in response to opening a new bug
still refers to bug-gnu-em...@gnu.org.
They refer to help-debbugs at gnu.org now,
11 matches
Mail list logo
