Re: [Bug-gnubg] Rollout presets

2007-07-24 Thread Achim Mueller
* Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070724 16:30]: I saved quick: set rollout truncation plies 12 set rollout trials 324 set rollout jsd minimumgames 216 set rollout jsd limit 1.9600 set rollout player 0 chequerplay plies 0 set rollout player 0 cubedecision plies 0 quick-cube-2ply: set ro

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Rollout presets

2007-07-24 Thread Hardy Hübener
On 24.07.2007 17:26 Massimiliano Maini wrote: Hmm ... gammonu.com is not a free site, you have to subscribe. And I do think that this kind of discussion should take place on this mailing list. Okay, here are my standard settings: A: Quick and dirty cubeless: 324 rollouts, Checkerplay: exper

RE: [Bug-gnubg] Rollout presets

2007-07-24 Thread David Levy
This sounds great! What would also be fabulous would be a way of (temporarily) changing the match score and running the rollouts. I feel that this is the most important feature that is in Snowie but not gnubg. Thanks, David _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Rollout presets

2007-07-24 Thread Massimiliano Maini
> That's great news How many buttons are there? Five? 5 > I propose to discuss standard settings at www.gammonu.com, where the > best players meet, including Neil Kazaross. Hmm ... gammonu.com is not a free site, you have to subscribe. And I do think that this kind of discussion should tak

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Rollout presets

2007-07-24 Thread Hardy Hübener
That's great news How many buttons are there? Five? I propose to discuss standard settings at www.gammonu.com, where the best players meet, including Neil Kazaross. I presently use 4 different sets of settings for rollouts. Hardy ;-) On 24.07.2007 16:16 Massimiliano Maini wrote: hi,

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread bar tomas
Thanks a lot for your replies! I'll get the latest source with cvs and try again with mingw and I'll get back to you. On 7/24/07, Jonathan Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Massimiliano Maini wrote: > >> > Bonus question: is sgf.c supposed to be generated from sgf.y ? >> > With what (under Win/

[Bug-gnubg] Rollout presets

2007-07-24 Thread Massimiliano Maini
hi, in the latest code there're the new "A", "B", ... "E" buttons allowing to quick-load rollout settings (stored in files a.rol, b.rol, etc). Would it make sense to provide some standard settings ? Something like: A --> quick 0-ply rollout B --> 2-ply truncated C --> 2-ply full Most of the pl

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Jonathan Kinsey
Massimiliano Maini wrote: > >> > Bonus question: is sgf.c supposed to be generated from sgf.y ? >> > With what (under Win/mingw) ? >> >> No - sgf.c is the file that deals with the sgf file format. sgfl.c >> and sgfp.c/h >> can be generated with flex and bison, they don't change much though so > n

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Massimiliano Maini
> > Bonus question: is sgf.c supposed to be generated from sgf.y ? > > With what (under Win/mingw) ? > > No - sgf.c is the file that deals with the sgf file format. sgfl.c > and sgfp.c/h > can be generated with flex and bison, they don't change much though so no real > need to sort it out. Hmm

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Jonathan Kinsey
Massimiliano Maini wrote: > >> Not sure, I think it's the fact that you've not run the auto* tools. > I guess >> one of those creates the dependency trees? >> >> I'm with Oystein, use mingw instead of cygwin - it's easier. > > Since we are on the subject, are the auto* tools supposed to work wit

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Øystein Johansen
Massimiliano Maini wrote: > Since we are on the subject, are the auto* tools supposed to work with > mingw ? Good question. I know they are available here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2435 ... but I've never tried them > For my builds I still use an "handcrafted" makefi

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Massimiliano Maini
> Not sure, I think it's the fact that you've not run the auto* tools. I guess > one of those creates the dependency trees? > > I'm with Oystein, use mingw instead of cygwin - it's easier. Since we are on the subject, are the auto* tools supposed to work with mingw ? For my builds I still use

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Jonathan Kinsey
bar tomas wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to compile the gnubg on cygwin 1.5, using the gnubg sources > included in the cygwin distribution (I did a full installation of > cygwin, which includes all available packages). > I am following the instructions in the INSTALL file included in the > /usr/src/

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Christian Anthon
Get the latest source from cvs instead: cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/gnubg co gnubg Christian. ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread Øystein Johansen
bar tomas wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to compile the gnubg on cygwin 1.5, using the gnubg sources > included in the cygwin distribution (I did a full installation of > cygwin, which includes all available packages). Just a first question back to you: Can you use mingw or MSYS instead? I believe

[Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin

2007-07-24 Thread bar tomas
Hi, I am trying to compile the gnubg on cygwin 1.5, using the gnubg sources included in the cygwin distribution (I did a full installation of cygwin, which includes all available packages). I am following the instructions in the INSTALL file included in the /usr/src/gnubg-0.14.3 directory of the