Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑ£º
ÄúºÃ£¡
ÕâÊÇÀ´×ÔÈðÀ´ÍøÂ磨ÏÃÃÅ£©ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾µÄÎʺ¸ÐлÄúÊÕ¿´Õâ·âÓʼþ¡£ÎÒÃÇÕæ³ÏµÄÏ£ÍûÄúÄܳÉΪÎÒÃÇÔÚ¹ó
µØÇøµÄÖØÒª»ï°é¡£ÎÒÃÇÊÇÒ»¼Ò²ÉÓÃÊÀ½ç¸ßм¼Êõ½á¾§£¬Ñо¿¡¢ÍƹãºÍ·¢Õ¹Ð¼¼Êõ£¬ÖÂÁ¦ÓÚ»¥ÁªÍøÐÅÏ¢·þÎñ¡¢µç
×ÓÉÌÎñ·þÎñºÍÆóÒµÓ¦Ó÷þÎñµÄ¸ßм¼ÊõÆóÒµ¡£ÏêÇéÇëä¯ÀÀ:http://www.chinawp.com
ÄúÓÐʲô
From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100
No; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new environment
that shares some substructure with the old environment.
ok i see this now.
But, does this test need a different execution environment? It's
Title: Untitled Document
º¹±Ç Æ÷Å» »çÀÌÆ®www.lotto in.co.kr
¡¤µðÁöÅÐȦµù½º ´ë±¸¡¤°æºÏÁö»ç
¡¤¹®ÀÇ:´ë±¸±¤¿ª½Ã
Title: Untitled Document
º¹±Ç Æ÷Å» »çÀÌÆ®www.lotto in.co.kr
¡¤µðÁöÅÐȦµù½º ´ë±¸¡¤°æºÏÁö»ç
¡¤¹®ÀÇ:´ë±¸±¤¿ª½Ã
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wolfgang_J=E4hrling?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:04:20 +0200
AFAIK, the glibc-people are rewriting the regex code for 2.3, because
the current implementation got unmaintainable and has various strange
limitations. This could be one of those.
