I just committed the fix and test case. Thanks!
Ludo’.
> I think this sentence is ungrammatical, or at least I’m lost.
eh, sorry, but consider the db as
h,db-len
e1 <- m = 0
e2
e3
e4
e5
e6 <- h*
e7
then db-len is 7 and db-len* is 2 and db-len - deb-len* = 5
which is the number of steps to go from e2 to e6, e.g.
we will scan through the list from m
Hi Stefan!
Thanks for your message!
Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
> The intention of unroll is to scan db to check that a commutative
> property for an item going into the function holds for all elements in
> db up to h==h* is found.
I think this sentence is ungrammatical, or at least I’m l
I will send an updated patch later, but to explain
I'm not the author of this so I need you to follow my analyze or we will
wait for
the author to check this!
The intention of unroll is to scan db to check that a commutative property
for an item going into the function holds for all elements in d
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
> --- a/module/language/tree-il/cse.scm
> +++ b/module/language/tree-il/cse.scm
> @@ -324,10 +324,11 @@
> (and (< n env-len)
> (match (vlist-ref env n)
>((#(exp* name sym db-len*) . h*)
> -
This is better!
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Stefan!
>
> Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
>
> > --- a/module/language/tree-il/cse.scm
> > +++ b/module/language/tree-il/cse.scm
> > @@ -324,10 +324,11 @@
> > (and (< n env-len)
> >
Hi Stefan!
Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
> --- a/module/language/tree-il/cse.scm
> +++ b/module/language/tree-il/cse.scm
> @@ -324,10 +324,11 @@
> (and (< n env-len)
> (match (vlist-ref env n)
>((#(exp* name sym db-len*) . h*)
> -
I did
git diff cse.scm > cse.diff
and send it with this mail (I removed the logging code though)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Can you send the proposed change as a unidiff patch?
>
> TIA,
> Ludo’.
>
cse.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi Stefan,
Can you send the proposed change as a unidiff patch?
TIA,
Ludo’.
Hey, the unroll code looks really weird in find-dominating-lexical, I know
it's difficult to
just come in and propose a change, but hey it can only help :-)
With this code,
(define (find-dominating-lexical exp effects env db)
(define (entry-matches? v1 v2)
(match (if (vector? v1) v1 v2)
Hello,
This piece of code triggers a CSE bug:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(use-modules (ice-9 match))
(define (snix-derivation->guix-package derivation)
(match derivation
(((_ _ _))
#t)))
--8<---cut here---end--
11 matches
Mail list logo
