bug#56556: texlive-babel-dutch with and without texlive-hyphen-dutch: No hyphenation patterns were preloaded

2024-08-31 Thread Nicolas Goaziou via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello, > Argh! I am just annoyed by this bug too; and again and again. How to > make progress? I'm closing this, as this issue has been fixed some time ago. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

bug#56556: texlive-babel-dutch with and without texlive-hyphen-dutch: No hyphenation patterns were preloaded

2023-05-19 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, Argh! I am just annoyed by this bug too; and again and again. How to make progress? On ven., 07 avril 2023 at 12:47, Emmanuel Beffara wrote: >> > I don't really know how we could fix this: maybe build the formats with >> > all the hyphenation packages enabled? >> >> The intertubes suggest

bug#56556: texlive-babel-dutch with and without texlive-hyphen-dutch: No hyphenation patterns were preloaded

2023-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Beffara
Hi, De Ludovic Courtès le 07/04/2023 à 12:33: > > I don't really know how we could fix this: maybe build the formats with > > all the hyphenation packages enabled? > > The intertubes suggest running ‘fmtutil --all’ to get hyphenations > packages straight. Is this something we should do in the Te

bug#56556: texlive-babel-dutch with and without texlive-hyphen-dutch: No hyphenation patterns were preloaded

2023-04-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Josselin and all, I was just bitten by the infamous: Package babel Warning: No hyphenation patterns were preloaded for […] That’s a real issue because it makes modular TeX Live pretty much unusable for languages other than English. Josselin Poiret skribis: >> Thirdly, formats are ap

bug#56556: TeXlive packaging issues

2023-03-29 Thread Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi Emmanuel, Emmanuel Beffara writes: > Firstly, unless I am missing something, creating a manifest with the right set > of packages is tedious: one has to guess the Guix package that matches each > LaTeX package, and the correspondence is not obvious. Thankfully, with a > working installation,

bug#56556: TeXlive packaging issues

2023-03-28 Thread Emmanuel Beffara
Hello Guix, I would like to share a few thoughts on how TeXlive is currently handled in Guix. The package `texlive` contains all of TeXlive, it works fine but it is arguably too big to be practical. The documentation rightfully says > We recommend using the modular package set because it is much

bug#56556:

2022-08-09 Thread Wicki Gabriel (wicg)
I have the same issue. Tested in German language -- it works just fine with the full-fledged LaTeX environment.

bug#56556: texlive-babel-dutch with and without texlive-hyphen-dutch: No hyphenation patterns were preloaded

2022-07-14 Thread Remco van 't Veer
Neither texlive-babel-dutch nor texlive-hyphen-dutch load hyphenation. Test document: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[dutch]{babel} \begin{document} test \end{document} Running with texlive-babel-dutch only: $ guix shell --pure texlive-base texlive-babel-dutch -- pdflatex test.t