Re: [PATCH] Check for null ports in auth server

2010-06-03 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 07:09:55PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > This patch makes the auth server fail with EINVAL if the rendezvous > port is null. Well, it certainly does look right to me... But I'd prefer if someone having more experience dealing with ports would check it. -antrik-

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: add padding to tmpfs_dirent structure

2010-06-03 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:18:44AM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > El Wed, 19 May 2010 23:32:37 +0200 > Samuel Thibault escribió: > > > Sergio Lopez, le Wed 19 May 2010 17:33:39 +0200, a écrit : > > > El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:05:27 +0200 > > > Carl Fredrik Hammar escribió: > > > > > > > On Tue, May

[PATCH] Fix malloc size in tmpfs

2010-06-03 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
* tmpfs/dir.c (diskfs_direnter_hard): Fix malloc size. --- Hello, Found this little doozy while examining Sergio's patches. ENTSIZE was changed back in 2f7f90ce to reflect the size of a struct dirent instead of a tmpfs_dirent, but NEW is still a tmpfs_dirent... I just snatched the old code prio

[PATCH] Check for null ports in auth server

2010-06-03 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
* auth/auth.c (S_auth_user_authenticate, S_auth_server_authenticate): Fail with EINVAL if RENDEZVOUS is MACH_PORT_NULL. --- Hi, This patch makes the auth server fail with EINVAL if the rendezvous port is null. I don't really think this needs much motivation but then again I also didn't think the

Re: news for 2010-05

2010-06-03 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi, On Mittwoch, 2. Juni 2010 00:00:20 olafbuddenha...@web.de wrote: > Hm... Do you mean to include this verbatim? I think it's rather > confusing out of context... > > The bottom line is that all drivers emulated by qemu and vmware work > fine now. That description is nice → verbatim replaced

Re: [PATCH] Check for rendezvous port death in auth server

2010-06-03 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hi, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:55:12AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:35:02PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:17:12AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > > I'm a bit ambivalent about this... On one hand, returning th