Re: behavior of NO SENDERS notifications when receive rights move

2016-10-04 Thread Brent W. Baccala
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: > "Brent W. Baccala" writes: > > > Now I'm wondering - how would DEAD NAME notifications be handled? > rpctrace > > would want to transfer send rights with the DN notifications attached (so > > it could wrap them both), but my experien

fprintf failing with EINTR

2016-10-04 Thread Brent W. Baccala
Aloha - I've seen this behavior several times with Hurd: fprintf(stderr, ...) will return -1 with errno = EINTR. I'm not used to fprintf failing like this (I'm getting used to it), and this last time I spent several hours hunting for a "bug" that turned out to be nothing more than a debugging sta

Re: Time for another round of releases

2016-10-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Richard Braun, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 16:45:46 +0200, wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:22:32PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > >> Is it possible to make a release of Hurd until mlockall/munlockall is > > >> implemented? From what I understand these functions are needed to build > > >> Hurd on > >

Re: Time for another round of releases

2016-10-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ludovic Courtès, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 15:22:32 +0200, wrote: > FWIW Guix follows upstream glibc releases for GNU/Linux (we’re currently > in the process of switching from 2.23 to 2.24), Ah! I was asking the question some time ago, and thought Guix was still on 2.22. We can easily upgrade to 2.23 and

Re: Time for another round of releases

2016-10-04 Thread Richard Braun
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:22:32PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Is it possible to make a release of Hurd until mlockall/munlockall is > >> implemented? From what I understand these functions are needed to build > >> Hurd on > >> top of glibc2.24. > > > > Yes, but our current glibc tree is ba

Re: Time for another round of releases

2016-10-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Samuel Thibault skribis: > Svante Signell, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 12:27:12 +0200, wrote: >> On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:54 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: >> > it is October, therefore, it is time for a new set of releases :) >> > >> > I'll be going over the changes and update the NEWS files as usual,

Re: Time for another round of releases

2016-10-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 12:27:12 +0200, wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:54 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > > it is October, therefore, it is time for a new set of releases :) > > > > I'll be going over the changes and update the NEWS files as usual, but > > feel free to beat me to that.

Re: Time for another round of releases

2016-10-04 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:54 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > Hello, > > it is October, therefore, it is time for a new set of releases :) > > I'll be going over the changes and update the NEWS files as usual, but > feel free to beat me to that.  Also, if anyone has some pet patches or > fixes that w