On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:24:16PM -1000, Brent W. Baccala wrote:
> > So, I'll modify libpager to handle multiple clients. Not trivial, but it
> > seems necessary and correct.
>
> Don't start that immediately, wait for more discussions. I'
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:20:45PM +0200, Richard Braun wrote:
> I started thinking about these only a couple of weeks ago, and so far
> the only solutions my limited brain can come up with is to either use
> the client context (by perhaps passing its root) but that could cause
> security issues, o
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:24:16PM -1000, Brent W. Baccala wrote:
> So, I'll modify libpager to handle multiple clients. Not trivial, but it
> seems necessary and correct.
Don't start that immediately, wait for more discussions. I'm not so
sure it would make sense to support more than one client.
Aloha -
My recent experiments with 'netmsg' have lead me to investigate the
operation of Hurd's exec server, and I've got a few questions.
First off, the current obstacle to exec'ing files over netmsg is the need
to operate the memory_object protocol over the TCP/IP connection. libpager
has a pr