https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #2 from Aleksandr ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #1)
> How do you run PHP? This directive only applies to things forked like CGI
> scripts. If you use mod_php or proxy_fcgi, these directives do not apply.
m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #4 from Aleksandr ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #3)
> That's not how the manual describes it. I think in that case it would not
> add much to just setting ulimits in the environment that starts Apache.
But
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #5 from Aleksandr ---
I wonder why you resolved this ticket. The only thing that RLimitMEM calls is
this ap_unixd_set_rlimit, and I've not found any other code enforcing this
limit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #6 from Aleksandr ---
(In reply to Aleksandr from comment #5)
> I wonder why you resolved this ticket. The only thing that RLimitMEM calls
> is this ap_unixd_set_rlimit, and I've not found any other code enforcing
&
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #7 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to Aleksandr from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eric Covener from comment #3)
> > That's not how the manual describes it. I think in that case it would not
> > add much to just se
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #8 from Eric Covener ---
> or there is a feature that has never worked.
The feature just doesn't limit how much memory mod_php can allocate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #9 from Aleksandr ---
Got it, what it does?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #10 from Aleksandr ---
Sorry. Let me explain the problem deeper. Documentation says:
```
This applies to processes forked from Apache httpd children servicing requests,
not the Apache httpd children themselves. This includes CGI
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #11 from Aleksandr ---
Again, if we're talking about 'processes forked from Apache httpd children
servicing requests', in my understanding those are apache instances, running as
www-data for example, not the mai
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
Bug ID: 66218
Summary: Please add support for HTTP/3
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.53
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #12 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to Aleksandr from comment #10)
> Sorry. Let me explain the problem deeper. Documentation says:
>
> ```
> This applies to processes forked from Apache httpd children servicing
> re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64462
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfh...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219
Bug ID: 66219
Summary: Apache 2.4.4.3 version having latency issues on RHEL7
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #13 from Aleksandr ---
Thank you so much, that's the plan at the moment - to run apache under some
ulimit restrictions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219
--- Comment #1 from Michael W Johnson ---
Does Apache offer any support for Apache 2.4.4.3 on any RHEL version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219
--- Comment #2 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to Michael W Johnson from comment #1)
> Does Apache offer any support for Apache 2.4.4.3 on any RHEL version?
Any help is best-effort from volunteers.
https://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
ayushi changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://trucks.tractorjunct
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
--- Comment #9 from ayushi ---
Best blog
https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck/3520-twin-steering
https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck/4220
https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223
Bug ID: 66223
Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of
SSL_do_handshake()
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223
UVScan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.zhao1...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224
Bug ID: 66224
Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_peek()
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66225
Bug ID: 66225
Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of
SSL_renegotiate()
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66226
Bug ID: 66226
Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of
SSL_CTX_set_session_id_context()
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224
UVScan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
--- Comment #8 from ayushi ---
Thanks for sharing this Infomational and helpfull post.
https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck/3520-twin-steering";>Ashok
Leyland 3520 Twin Steering
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66228
Bug ID: 66228
Summary: Apache fails to start with "(38)Function not
implemented: AH00141: Could not initialize random
number generator"
Product: Apac
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66228
--- Comment #1 from frederic.li...@free.fr ---
The problem seems to be my kernel version which is 3.14
# uname -r
3.14.32--grs-ipv6-64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66225
--- Comment #1 from UVScan ---
If httpd does not check the return value of SSL_renegotiate(), it could cause a
DoS attack.
Since SSL renegotiation process needs many computing resources and the current
httpd does not break the renegotiation
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
engrand changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from engrand ---
Did
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241
Bug ID: 66241
Summary: Apache server automatically restarting while getting
multiple requests
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.10
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
OS
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
Bug ID: 66243
Summary: Nested #include not detected / path not taken
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #1 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> ---
Created attachment 38377
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38377&action=edit
WIP + debug messaging
This is the current WIP I'm using to explore the issue. The
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #2 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> ---
Created attachment 38378
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38378&action=edit
Test case HTML files
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #3 from Eric Covener ---
> the sub-requests for the nested #include statements get a new request_rec so
> the following code never triggers:
I think on the surface it is anticipating that a new request_rec will be used
an
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #4 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> ---
With some further debug messages I've identified the cause but not the
solution!
All calls to includes_filter() have the same, original request_rec address -
including the sub-requests
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #5 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> ---
Vital typo in previous comment (put level1-A4.html twice)!
* includes_filter() r=0x7fc5f45150a0 r->request_config=0x7fc5f4516388
parent=0x0
In handle_include() the 'rr'
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #6 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> ---
Going further; attempting to use the presence of my new env-var
SSI_INCLUDE_LEVEL >= 1 to trigger the nested path in includes_filter() causes a
SIGSEGV because r->main is always NULL.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004
--- Comment #22 from rtnf...@gmail.com ---
Mentioned in :
https://operations.osmfoundation.org/2022/07/24/standard-tile-layer.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
maikhu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maikhu...@gmail.com
--
You are
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
Bug ID: 66253
Summary: rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: n
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #2 from max ---
i want save log with 50M per file, and two file for rotate. total 100m space
is there a good method to gen log file xx.1.log xx.2.log or
xx.2022-xxx(date).log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Eric Covener
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #4 from Eric Covener ---
Whoops, never pasted:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/rotatelogs.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #5 from max ---
while true; do echo 123; done | rotatelogs -n2 1.%Y-%m-%d-%H_%M_%S.log 1k
Cannot use -n with % in filename
if not append -n2, it will gen many log file
how to make a limit of number of file
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #6 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to max from comment #5)
> while true; do echo 123; done | rotatelogs -n2 1.%Y-%m-%d-%H_%M_%S.log 1k
> Cannot use -n with % in filename
>
>
> if not append -n2, it will ge
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #7 from max ---
so it is too bother
so i think it can add option to control log file suffix when with -n option
can save log file with x.1.log x.2.log
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349
--- Comment #1 from benjamin.demart...@liege.be ---
I'm encountering this as well, only when proxying a request with
content-encoding set. My guess is that mod_proxy_html is executed at the wrong
time and executing either before proxied re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
benjamin.demart...@liege.be changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.4.25 |2.4.37
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349
benjamin.demart...@liege.be changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.4.33 |2.4.37
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349
benjamin.demart...@liege.be changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benjamin.demart
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349
--- Comment #2 from benjamin.demart...@liege.be ---
I can confirm, a bit more googling showed me the answer:
Either you register the proxy-html filter manually in between INFLATE and
DEFLATE using `SetOutputFilter INFLATE;xml2enc;proxy-html
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
Bug ID: 66256
Summary: connection reset uploading large files
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
--- Comment #1 from pushakk ---
I have changed some reqtimeout mod params without results. Disable this mod
does not work neither.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
pushakk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |CLOSED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
--- Comment #3 from Eric Covener ---
The default was recently changed. But the manual looks correct here:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#limitrequestbody
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
--- Comment #4 from pushakk ---
Hello,
but, in this link it say
Valor por defecto: LimitRequestBody 0
and 0 is unlimited.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
--- Comment #5 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to pushakk from comment #4)
> Hello,
>
> but, in this link it say
>
> Valor por defecto:LimitRequestBody 0
>
> and 0 is unlimited.
Looks like an out of date trans
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267
Bug ID: 66267
Summary: mod_rewrite returns 403 when a directory with the same
name as RewriteRule exists in server's root directory
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Eric Covener
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267
Sato Kenta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66273
Bug ID: 66273
Summary: Traffic is halted in apache when one of the worker
network connection is down
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.34
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66273
MDReddy changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from MDReddy ---
In
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66274
Bug ID: 66274
Summary: I need to add Total column as shown below. So far my
code looks like this. What is the best way to archive
that?
Product: Apache httpd-2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66273
--- Comment #2 from MDReddy ---
Update : Performed the same test with connectiontimeout=5 and results are
little different compare to above mentioned. There was no halt seen but no of
requests sent to other node is very limited. Throughput was
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66274
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280
Bug ID: 66280
Summary: ap_uname2id() / ap_gname2id() disregard errno (esp.
EINTR) from getpwnam() / getgrnam()
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537
--- Comment #7 from Cedric Roijakkers ---
It's been over a year since my last comment in this thread. We've been running
in production with the patch supplied in this bug, everything is working fine.
The latest httpd release is now
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66282
Bug ID: 66282
Summary: mod_proxy_https adds "Content-Encoding: chunked" to
requests that have no body
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.53
Ha
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #8 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537
--- Comment #9 from Cedric Roijakkers ---
Version 2.4.54 is what I tried with, that got me fooled by looking into this
issue again. To be more precise, I based my container on top of docker
container httpd:2.4.54-alpine3.16. The full httpd -V
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66282
Stefan Eissing changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Stefan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66286
Bug ID: 66286
Summary: Replace ap_pbase64decode with apr_pbase64_decode
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66286
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Nießen ---
Created attachment 38395
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38395&action=edit
patch v1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66286
Tobias Nießen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66286
--- Comment #2 from Eric Covener ---
as you said, removing the function would be a breaking change to compiled
modules and even ones that were re-compiled since they'd still have those
references. We'd avoid those as they are not ba
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64451
--- Comment #1 from Rainer ---
I can confirm this behaviour with 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.12. The body will be
partially passed to the application if chunked transfer is used and transfer of
a chunk exceeds the timeout. Additionally configuration
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66288
Bug ID: 66288
Summary: Randi
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66288
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66290
Bug ID: 66290
Summary: ErrorDocument is not sent when mod_security changes
error code in phase 3/4
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.53
Hardware: PC
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297
Bug ID: 66297
Summary: Undefined symbol: RAND_egd
modules/ssl/.libs/libmod_ssl.a(ssl_engine_rand.o)
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: Sun
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung ---
There seems to be an OpenSSL header file mixup.
When OpenSSL is compiled, it detects egd support. The definition of RAND_egd()
in openssl/rand.h is protected by an
# ifndef OPENSSL_NO_EGD
and in (my
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297
--- Comment #2 from ran.mo...@oracle.com ---
Thanks for looking into it Rainer.
I double checked that and I don’t think to have conflicting versions of the
openssl in the included paths. I cleaned the path
/var/opt/sun/xvm/uce/opt/server
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44181
Smylers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smyl...@stripey.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297
--- Comment #3 from ran.mo...@oracle.com ---
exchanging information also with openssl folks, they said that the
configuration used in opensslconf.h and rand.h is disabling the RAND_egd by
default unless openssl is compiled with "enabl
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Jung ---
> configure:27443: checking for OpenSSL
> configure:27456: checking for user-provided OpenSSL base directory
> configure:27472: result: /var/opt/sun/xvm/uce/opt/server
> configure:27809: checking
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66300
Bug ID: 66300
Summary: mod_proxy_hcheck does not detect AJP/CPING support
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66300
alessandro.cavali...@unibo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You
1401 - 1500 of 2838 matches
Mail list logo
