Re: RFR 7191662: JCE providers should be located via ServiceLoader

2015-06-03 Thread Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng
Correct, if the makefile related changes are removed then no need for build team to review 7191662 webrev anymore. There are other discussions ongoing and we should be able to reach a decision in a day or two. Will update the list again. Thanks, Valerie On 06/01/15 16:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie w

Re: Code review request: 8010192: Enable native JGSS provider on Mac

2013-05-03 Thread Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng
So, has this changes been tested against the existing regression tests on Mac? After this, is the native JGSS provider get used on Mac for most if not all Kerberos operation or is it still Java Kerberos? Otherwise, changes look ok to me. Valerie On 03/18/13 05:38, Erik Joelsson wrote: The b

Re: RFR: 8006818: SunEC and SunPKCS11 providers should be in all profiles

2013-03-19 Thread Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng
Also, for jdk7 and its update releases, SunPKCS11 provider isn't built for Windows 64-bit. Just FYI. Valerie On 03/19/13 12:49, Alan Bateman wrote: On 19/03/2013 16:19, Jen Dority wrote: Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8006818/webrev/. This resolves JDK-8006818 which calls

Re: Building sunpkcs11.jar

2012-05-25 Thread Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng
Oracle 7u4 jre to not require a signed crypto provider -- Tom -Original Message----- From: Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng [mailto:valerie.p...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 12:11 PM To: Deneau, Tom Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Building sunpkcs11.jar The provider built fr

Re: Building sunpkcs11.jar

2012-05-25 Thread Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng
The provider built from OpenJDK workspace is unsigned. It can't be used with Oracle 7u4 JRE which require crypto provider to be signed for export/import conformance. If Your company has a JCE code signing keypair, you can sign the provider built using OpenJDK with that keypair and then use it