2018/6/29 3:03:09 -0700, volker.simo...@gmail.com:
> This still doesn't explain why replacing one trademark with another
> one is helpful here.
Perhaps some trademarks are more important than others.
> After Phil's remark, OpenJDK doesn't even seem to be registered as a
> trademark, so in that se
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 8:02 PM, wrote:
> 2018/6/27 23:21:34 -0700, volker.simo...@gmail.com:
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:08 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> “OpenJDK” is a trademarked term, per the OpenJDK Trademark Notice [1].
>>> As such it should be used only as an adject
I see the TM for JDK as Volker notes,
but searching for OpenJDK at the same site turns up nothing ..
-phil
On 06/27/2018 11:21 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
And by the way, "JDK" is an Oracle trademark as well (see [1]) so this
change is basically a NOP.
Best regards,
Volker
[1]http://tmsearch.us
2018/6/27 23:21:34 -0700, volker.simo...@gmail.com:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:08 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> “OpenJDK” is a trademarked term, per the OpenJDK Trademark Notice [1].
>> As such it should be used only as an adjective, and not as a noun.
>> Phrases such as “the
2018/6/28 0:14:26 -0700, Aleksey Shipilev :
> On 06/28/2018 08:21 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> Sorry, but I don't see any sense in this change!
>
> +1
>
> Also, "(open-source) JDK" is way too generic, and does awkwardly apply
> to other JDK's in the wild, including IBM's, Azul's, Excelsior's,
> e
On 06/28/2018 09:14 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 06/28/2018 08:21 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:08 AM, wrote:
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205956
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/
>>>
>>> Quick links to handier HTML diffs:
2018/6/27 16:19:58 -0700, tim.b...@oracle.com:
> Looks good to me as well.
>
> Tim
>
> On 06/27/18 15:33, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Looks good.
>>
>> /Erik
Thanks!
- Mark
On 06/28/2018 08:21 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:08 AM, wrote:
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205956
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/
>>
>> Quick links to handier HTML diffs:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/doc/
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:08 AM, wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205956
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/
>
> Quick links to handier HTML diffs:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/doc/building.html.hdiff.html
> http://cr.openjdk.java.ne
Mark-
Looks good to me as well.
Tim
On 06/27/18 15:33, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-06-27 15:08, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205956
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-06-27 15:08, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205956
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/
Quick links to handier HTML diffs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/doc/building.html.hdiff.html
ht
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205956
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/
Quick links to handier HTML diffs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/doc/building.html.hdiff.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8205956/doc/testing.html.hdiff.html
“OpenJDK
12 matches
Mail list logo