Re: can not stop my auto running project

2007-10-13 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Sunday 14 October 2007 05:16, yin yinhai wrote: > HI: >I am building my root filesystem, my develop environment is: montavista > 2.6.10 kernel, busybox-1.5.1, NFS. >If I run my project by manual, when it is running, I can use "ctrl+c" to > stop it. But if I add commands in "/etc/rc.d/r

Re: [patch] setsebool applet

2007-10-13 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 00:58, Yuichi Nakamura wrote: > Hi. > > This patch is support for setsebool applet. > setsebool is to set boolean parameters of SELinux. > It is useful to manage SELinux system. > > getsebool is included in BusyBox, but setsebool > is not included yet. > Please inclu

can not stop my auto running project

2007-10-13 Thread yin yinhai
HI: I am building my root filesystem, my develop environment is: montavista 2.6.10 kernel, busybox-1.5.1, NFS. If I run my project by manual, when it is running, I can use "ctrl+c" to stop it. But if I add commands in "/etc/rc.d/rc.local" to auto running project, now when I open the power

Re: Problem with httpd and POST data for cgi, and patch

2007-10-13 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Friday 12 October 2007 17:57, Ralf Friedl wrote: > Hi > > I just found out that my previous patch only works for POST data smaller > that hdr_buf. This patch should also work for larger POST data. Thanks for the patch! > --- networking/httpd.c > +++ networking/httpd.c > @@ -1051,6 +1051,10 @

bzip2 in busybox

2007-10-13 Thread Denys Vlasenko
Hi Julian, I added bzip2 applet to busybox. See http://busybox.net/ for more info about busybox. In the process of adapting it, I found a few places where I can optimize it a bit. However, bigger optimizations came simply from declaring functions static, as recent gcc versions are using register

Re: NOMMU: stack versus malloc?

2007-10-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Johan Adolfsson wrote: > Sorry, no pointers but here are some thoughts I hopefully recall correctly > from the time before our chip got an MMU and we used NO_MMU uClinux and > uClibc. > Things may have improved a lot since then so take it with a grain of salt: > > * uCl

Re: NOMMU: stack versus malloc?

2007-10-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > > >> For example, lineedit.c currently eats 12k+ if stack. > > > > >> > > > > >> I can convert it into malloc use. > > > > >> > > > > >> Question: is it better or actually worse? > > > > >> Line editing is invoked repeatedly, and repeated mal