On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 00:37, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 23 Mar 2019, at 18:35, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 22 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like act_conndscp has been shot down by the kernel people, at
>
> On 23 Mar 2019, at 18:35, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 22 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
>> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like act_conndscp has been shot down by the kernel people, at least
>> in its current form. Setting a conntrack mark from tc is regarded as “n
> On 22 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
> It looks like act_conndscp has been shot down by the kernel people, at least
> in its current form. Setting a conntrack mark from tc is regarded as “not
> sure if it is a good idea”. The other way (conntrack to skb) is fine.
It looks like act_conndscp has been shot down by the kernel people, at least in
its current form. Setting a conntrack mark from tc is regarded as “not sure if
it is a good idea”. The other way (conntrack to skb) is fine. That’s sort of
good news in that ingress is the hard bit as it’s problem
> On 20 Mar 2019, at 09:54, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> thanks for the information!
>
>> On Mar 20, 2019, at 10:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Mar 2019, at 08:38, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> Impressive! I had a look at yo
Hi Kevin,
thanks for the information!
> On Mar 20, 2019, at 10:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 20 Mar 2019, at 08:38, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> Impressive! I had a look at your_layer_cake.qos, and with half the brain at
>> my disposal currently, I am
And another - sorry! - some stats/info
overlimits counts the number of packets that have had their DSCP
overwritten/restored/set
requeues counts the number of times the ’statemask’ bit has been SET.
root@Router:~# tc -s filter show dev eth0
filter parent cacf: protocol all pref 10 u32 chain 0
f
Addendum: If not obvious. There are two separate instances of ‘conndscp’, one
on the egress path (in ‘both’ mode) and one on the ingress path (in ’set’ mode)
Cheers,
Kevin D-B
gpg: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
___
Cake mailing
> On 20 Mar 2019, at 08:38, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Impressive! I had a look at your_layer_cake.qos, and with half the brain at
> my disposal currently, I am confused. I had thought the idea is to set dscp
> marks on internal hosts or the LAN interface ofva router and copy
Hi Kevin,
Impressive! I had a look at your_layer_cake.qos, and with half the brain at my
disposal currently, I am confused. I had thought the idea is to set dscp marks
on internal hosts or the LAN interface ofva router and copy those to incoming
packets of the same flow, but you seem to set dsc
> On 20 Mar 2019, at 03:31, Ryan Mounce wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 07:57, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Ryan Mounce wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> I've finally applied your patches, compiled, and flashed on my router.
>>> Could you share
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 07:57, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Ryan Mounce wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > I've finally applied your patches, compiled, and flashed on my router.
> > Could you share your tc filter action for conndscp to get me started?
>
> Ahh! O
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>> On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:41, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>>
On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Ryan Mounce wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I've finally applied your patches, compiled, and flashed on my router.
Co
> On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:41, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>
>>> On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Ryan Mounce wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> I've finally applied your patches, compiled, and flashed on my router.
>>> Could you share your tc filter action for co
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>> On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Ryan Mounce wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> I've finally applied your patches, compiled, and flashed on my router.
>> Could you share your tc filter action for conndscp to get me started?
>
> Ahh! Ooops yes knew I forgot something - her
> On 19 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Ryan Mounce wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I've finally applied your patches, compiled, and flashed on my router.
> Could you share your tc filter action for conndscp to get me started?
Ahh! Ooops yes knew I forgot something - here’s my hacked up
sqm-scripts/my_layer_ca
Hi Kevin,
I've finally applied your patches, compiled, and flashed on my router.
Could you share your tc filter action for conndscp to get me started?
-Ryan
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 06:39, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
>
> I’m not looking forward to the response/s from upstream but we shall see
I’m not looking forward to the response/s from upstream but we shall see :-)
Here are the patches for a new tc action conndscp - both the kernel module and
tc’s control of it.
Cheers,
Kevin D-B
gpg: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
0001-initial-experimental-support-for-a
18 matches
Mail list logo