Hi Suraj.
If the V6 programming failed, you should see a message in dmesg saying
about the done pin not going high. Also make sure you haven't compiled
for the LX110T if you have an SX95T board, or vise virsa.
Regards,
David
On 27 July 2010 21:44, Suraj Gowda wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> The file perm
On Jul 27, 2010, at 12:44 , Suraj Gowda wrote:
Also, the MD5 checksum of the .bof running on the roach matches the
original.
I assume you mean the .bof NOT running on the roach matches the
original. :-)
The only thing I can suggest is checking the output of dmesg and/or
retrying with BO
Hi Dave,
The file permissions are
-rwxr-xr-x 1 43845 300 4469095 Jul 26 2010 1.bof
-rwxr-xr-x 1 43845 300 4469090 Jul 22 2010 2.bof
Also, the MD5 checksum of the .bof running on the roach matches the
original.
Thanks,
-Suraj
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:57:59 -0700, David MacMahon
wrote:
> On Jul
On Jul 27, 2010, at 10:33 , Suraj Gowda wrote:
When I try to run the .bof from the ROACH command line, it returns
with
"Input/Output Error". The ROACH is NFS mounted and I put the bof
in the
filesystem via scp.
Sounds like a corrupted/incomplete bof file. What are its
permissions on t
Hi Jason,
I know programming over JTAG won't change tcpborphserver's device
listings, but if the devices for both bitstreams/bofs were identical, then
using the working bof to program and then overriting the bitstream for the
FPGA would be manually doing what borph is supposed to do, right?
Hi Da
Hi, Suraj,
Have you tried running the bof file from the command line while
logged into the ROACH? Another thing to check is whether the 1.bof
file you created is identical to the 1.bof file that got uploaded to
the roach. How did you transfer 1.bof onto the ROACH?
Dave
On Jul 26, 2010,
This is telling you that the FPGA isn't programmed. Unfortunately you
can't go'n program the FPGA behind tcpborphserver's back because it
keeps state (including register listings etc). You need to use
myfpga.progdev('mybof.bof'), for example.
Jason
On 26 Jul 2010, at 22:39, surajgo...@berk
Hi all,
I have 2 different .bof's for a 128 channel, 3ghz bandwidth spectrometer.
For implementation 1.bof, I get the (unhelpful) error message below when I
try to run fpga.listdev(). If I instead program with 2.bof (which works
fine), and then use the JTAG cable to program the FPGA with 1.bit,
8 matches
Mail list logo