of Jack
Hickish
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2024 6:18:47 AM
To: casper
Subject: Re: [casper] pfb_coeff_gen_calc shifted sinc arguments
You don't often get email from jackhick...@gmail.com. Learn why this is
important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
and was pointed out
and was pointed out to me by the late Frankin Antonio (lest I take
credit for a level of detail-orientation I don't possess)
On Thu, 30 May 2024, 01:46 Andrew Martens, wrote:
> Hi Nathan
>
> This bug (if we are talking about the same one) was fixed in a commit 2
> years ago but has not made
] pfb_coeff_gen_calc shifted sinc arguments
You don't often get email from and...@sarao.ac.za. Learn why this is
important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
Hi Nathan
This bug (if we are talking about the same one) was fixed in a commit 2 years
ago but has not made it into the main re
Hi Nathan
This bug (if we are talking about the same one) was fixed in a commit 2
years ago but has not made it into the main repo yet.
It was pointed out to me by Jack Hickish.
For more info see
https://github.com/ska-sa/mlib_devel/commit/702d962842b53f76ec661b27b1156679ccb71929
The fixed
Hi all,
I was comparing the coarse channelization response and taps from a CASPER
instrument to other window design routines and noticed a small discrepancy
comparing to pfb_coeff_gen_calc.
The argument to the sinc to generate an ideal lowpass filter is typically
-wc..wc. Different routines
5 matches
Mail list logo