Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-12-01 Thread Priyank Kiran
; >>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsmoh.html >>> >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Mohammed Al Baqari >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* ccie_vo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-12-01 Thread Divin Mathew John
t;> >> >> ** ** >> >> Regards, >> >> Mohammed Al Baqari >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert Thomas >> *Sent:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-30 Thread Priyank Kiran
Behalf Of *Robert Thomas > *Sent:* Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:43 AM > *To:* Divin Mathew John > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Priyank Kiran > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior*** > * > > ** ** > > Divin is right. MTP doesnt su

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-30 Thread Mohammed Al Baqari
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Robert Thomas Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:43 AM To: Divin Mathew John Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Priyank Kiran Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior Divi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-26 Thread Robert Thomas
Divin is right. MTP doesnt support connecting to a multicast stream, so it would make sense CUCM converts it to a unicast stream. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Divin Mathew John wrote: > I think this is normal behaviour. MULTICAST MOH cannot go thru MTP. as in > the MTP cannot re-originate t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-25 Thread Divin Mathew John
I think this is normal behaviour. MULTICAST MOH cannot go thru MTP. as in the MTP cannot re-originate the stream. CUCM uses Unicast MOH instead. At least in the lab scenario, try not to check MTP box. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ashraf Ayyash wrote: > I Got real case for the same issue but

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-25 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
I Got real case for the same issue but longtime ago , cannot remember 100% what i have done on it can you please collect ccm sdi sdl and IPVMS detailed traces for the both calls ? I will may take a look when i will have Chance to , but i also need to know why you have enabled the MTP first place a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
It does On Thursday, November 24, 2011, Mohd Baqari wrote: > The MRGL of MTP should have MoH multicast. > > Regards, > Mohammed Al Baqari > Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Priyank Kiran wrote: > > No it's not, have 2 MRGLs > > 1) MRGL attached to DP of gateway and MTP are same

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Mohd Baqari
The MRGL of MTP should have MoH multicast. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Priyank Kiran wrote: > No it's not, have 2 MRGLs > > 1) MRGL attached to DP of gateway and MTP are same > mrgl-siteXX > mrg-moh + > mrg-mtp-siteXX > 2) MRGL attached to DP

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
No it's not, have 2 MRGLs 1) MRGL attached to DP of gateway and MTP are same > mrgl-siteXX > mrg-moh + mrg-mtp-siteXX 2) MRGL attached to DP of MoH server > mrgl-moh > mrg-moh Would like to point out that I only have 1 muticast source and server in my cluster which has been bound to mrg-moh.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Mohd Baqari
What is the MRGL assigned to the device pool of your MTP. Is it the same MoH multicast MRGL. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Priyank Kiran wrote: > Experts, > > Need help understanding the following behavior conceptually - > > Have the subscrib

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
I think that is exactly what I am getting at after all the observations - perhaps multicast cannot traverse the MTP and that is where I would like to understand the reasoning behind it. Everything is set at G711 with my setup. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:08 PM, datucha123 datucha123 wrote: > An

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread datucha123 datucha123
And what's the Regiong settings between the GW to MoH and and GW to IP Phones? If everything is G711, then maybe the Multicast cannot traverse the MTP? On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Priyank Kiran wrote: > Using G711. The region setting b/w the MOH server DP and phone DP is G711. > > Priyank

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
Using G711. The region setting b/w the MOH server DP and phone DP is G711. Priyank On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:06 PM, datucha123 datucha123 wrote: > What codec are you using for normal Voice calls? is it G729? > > If yes, then I have the following on my mind: > > Look, when we use G729 for Voice

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread datucha123 datucha123
What codec are you using for normal Voice calls? is it G729? If yes, then I have the following on my mind: Look, when we use G729 for Voice Calls, and then try to hold the PSTN phone, then the gateway need to connect to MoH with G711, as the Routers Flash MoH file is G711 only. And in your case,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread datucha123 datucha123
Very interesting thing. I am not at my Lab side now, but tommorow will get there and test it also. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Priyank Kiran wrote: > Experts, > > Need help understanding the following behavior conceptually - > > Have the subscriber as dedicated MOH multicast server incremen

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
Experts, Need help understanding the following behavior conceptually - Have the subscriber as dedicated MOH multicast server incrementing on port with default address 239.1.1.1 port 16384 Remote H323 gateway, with local music-on-hold wav file spoofing the above source address. This works as expec