> Dale Tronrud
>>>
>>>> RSRZ, in my most humble of opinions, seems like one of those statistics
>>>>>
>>>> that
>>>
>>>> is far more useful in theory than reality. Particularly for
>>>>> medium-resolution structures, the fit of each entire sid
edium-resolution structures, the fit of each entire side chain to the
>>> density
>>>>> is likely to be imperfect because the density is imperfect, especially
>>> toward
>>>>> the tips of those side chains.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then
opers of RSRZ
analysis need to tune it a bit to make it fully useful.
L.
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Matthew
Bratkowski [mab...@cornell.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:12 AM
To:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Cal
density
> > > >> is likely to be imperfect because the density is imperfect,
> especially
> > > toward
> > > >> the tips of those side chains.
> > > >>
> > > >> Then again, it can be a good flag for bits of the structure worth a
> >
t; Then again, it can be a good flag for bits of the structure worth a
> > second
> > >> look in rebuilding.
> > >
> > > The latter is certainly true. It may mean that the developers of RSRZ
> > > analysis need to tune it a bit to make it fully usef
be a good flag for bits of the structure worth a
> > second
> > >> look in rebuilding.
> > >
> > > The latter is certainly true. It may mean that the developers of RSRZ
> > > analysis need to tune it a bit to make it fully useful.
> > >
> > >
>> Then again, it can be a good flag for bits of the structure worth a
> second
> >> look in rebuilding.
> >
> > The latter is certainly true. It may mean that the developers of RSRZ
> > analysis need to tune it a bit to make it fully useful.
> >
> > L.
> >
analysis need to tune it a bit to make it fully useful.
>
> L.
>
>>
>>
>> From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Matthew
>> Bratkowski [mab...@cornell.edu]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:12
> Bratkowski [mab...@cornell.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:12 AM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] Calculation of RSRZ Score in PDB Validation Reports
>
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone knew how the RSRZ score was calculated in the
>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Phoebe A. Rice wrote:
> RSRZ, in my most humble of opinions, seems like one of those statistics
> that is far more useful in theory than reality.
>
Can't agree more!
Pavel
ts of the structure worth a second look
in rebuilding.
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Matthew
Bratkowski [mab...@cornell.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:12 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Calculation of RSRZ
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone knew how the RSRZ score was calculated in the
protein data bank validation reports and how useful of a metric this
actually is for structure validation? I am trying to improve this score on
a structure that I am working on, but I'm not really sure where to beg
12 matches
Mail list logo
