Greetings, Ben.
I am replying directly because I do not have a definitive answer.
On 2021-04-08 00:32, Ben Huntsman via cctalk wrote:
I know this is a strange place to ask, but it's as good a place as any.
Anyone on here used IBM's XLC in very old versions?
Anyone know what the argument -qdebu
Certainly the published interface is constrained by what was
"officially" released. Just pondering if there was an internal
engineering roadmap from 16->18->22 bits around this time or did things
evolve more discretely?
I think it evolved. Remember there was one type of core memory for the
On 4/9/21 6:05 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> Linked lists go back a long way. FAT is one, in a sense. DECtape file
> systems for DOS (also RSTS) are linked, in the blocks. The same goes for the
> CDC 6000 file system (more precisely, it has contiguous blocks within a
> track, and links
On 4/8/21 4:48 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> From: Jerry Weiss
> I always wondered why the RKV11-D was only 16 bit addressable.
The manual (EK-RKV11-OP-001) says: "Since the 11/03 BUS structure has no
provision for extended addressing, no connection is made to the bus from
thes
Linked lists go back a long way. FAT is one, in a sense. DECtape file systems
for DOS (also RSTS) are linked, in the blocks. The same goes for the CDC 6000
file system (more precisely, it has contiguous blocks within a track, and links
from the last block in the track to the next track number
