Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
What is it with desire to bypass defect management? I mean I can
perfectly understand Thomas's curiosity, but why would end-user such as
Giulio want it off?
I can squeeze some scenarios out of my phantasy.
Like: 1 hour 40 minutes is too long for a backup win
Hi,
> What is it with desire to bypass defect management? I mean I can
> perfectly understand Thomas's curiosity, but why would end-user such as
> Giulio want it off?
I can squeeze some scenarios out of my phantasy.
Like: 1 hour 40 minutes is too long for a backup window.
Or: The media are perf
> (i.e. no spare area) by dvd+rw-format option
> -ssa=none
>
> It might also be worth to check the impact of certification
> on write error detection. I.e.:
> -format=full
>
> I would propose to try both. It would be most economic to
> do -ssa=none first, because i would expect it to be
>
Hi,
> > [dvd+rw-format] -format=full
>
> I think my kernel is too old, it exit after just 1 second:
>
> $ dvd+rw-format -format=full /dev/cdrom
> * BD/DVD±RW/-RAM format utility by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 7.1.
> * 25.0GB BD media detected.
> * formatting 0.0|:-[ FORMAT UNIT failed with SK
Hi,
i tested WRITE12 and Streaming bit on DVD-RAM. Up to
the first bad spot on my test media writing runs with nearly
nominal speed:
Effective 1.8x with nominal 2x DVD-RAM.
Without Streaming bit, WRITE12 and WRITE10 both perform
at 0.8x effective speed.
-
To Giulio:
Please get the newest c
5 matches
Mail list logo
