On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Centosplus's priority was 1. I had totally forgotten a special kernel
> was in that repo and no, I don't have the kernel excluded in
> base/updates. I have since increased the priority of all Centos repos
> other than base t
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 14:29 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I found I have the following kernels installed last night:
> >
> > kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
> > kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus
> > kernel-devel-2.6
In CentOS 5.1 - if I had a folder open on my desktop on one worskspace
screen and I was in another workspace, and I double clicked the folder
icon on my desktop, it would bring the open folder to my current workspace.
In CentOS 5.2 it does not do that. I can't find a setting to change the
beha
post it on the centos bug tracker to start..:)
listmail wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
a
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, listmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
> >> a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:32:49PM +0100, John Horne wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:28 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:04:00PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > I can't think of anything that explains this. I have a 6-month-old
> > > CentOS 5.2
> > I doubt it; 5.2 h
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found I have the following kernels installed last night:
>
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.6.
Ideally I would like a link to a webpage entitled "How I learnt to stop
worrying and run spamass-milter as root".
We've got a few boxen running spamd as non-privileged user, but
spamassassin milter runs as root with no problems.
On the flip-side to your query, I haven't found anything that st
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:28 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:04:00PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > I can't think of anything that explains this. I have a 6-month-old CentOS
> > 5.2
> > install, with nothing out of the ordinary, as far as I can recall.
>
> I doubt it; 5.
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 22:04 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008 21:23:52 Stephen Harris wrote:
> >
> > What does
> > find /var/spool/cron -type f ! -size 0
> > show?
> >
> Does that mean 'not = size 0'?
>
Yes.
>
> I can't think of anything that explains this. I have a 6-month-o
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:04:00PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008 21:23:52 Stephen Harris wrote:
> > What does
> > find /var/spool/cron -type f ! -size 0
> > show?
> >
> Does that mean 'not = size 0'?
"not (size = 0)", but yeah.
> /var/spool/cron/anne
> /var/spool/cron/root
I found I have the following kernels installed last night:
kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus
kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5
kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus
because of a problem with remote reboots which fails most
of the time, and it's difficult to get into the co-lo site, and the ISP does
not keep personnel at the building all the time. Only when someone needs to
get in, or has a problem will they send someone downtown.
PITA. Suggest you look
on 7-18-2008 3:55 PM MHR spake the following:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
I'm glad you feel that way because I have been having this pain in my
shoulder ;-P
Scott, I thought you /were/ that pain in the shoulder
;^)
mhr
Nope... I am usually a pain in a som
On Sunday 20 July 2008 21:23:52 Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:18:05PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 July 2008 17:44:23 Bill Campbell wrote:
> > > Does anything show up with ``find /var/spool/cron -type f''?
> >
> > /var/spool/cron/apache
> > /var/spool/cron/rpc
>
>
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:14:25 -0400:
> Most likely different controller,
Ah, well, right. I'm used from Windows that it doesn't matter much. ;-)
The rescue system seems to use ata_piix. Unfortunately, I'm now getting a
weird "Error: 0" with all of my last boots once it loo
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:18:05PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008 17:44:23 Bill Campbell wrote:
> > Does anything show up with ``find /var/spool/cron -type f''?
> >
> /var/spool/cron/apache
> /var/spool/cron/rpc
[43 more lines deleted]
Wow, looks like somebody or something has
On Sunday 20 July 2008 20:03:45 John Horne wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 19:20 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 July 2008 18:04:10 Chris Clonch wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 July 2008 11:50:21 Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:24:31 Robert - elists wrote:
> > > > > > > Wha
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I just replaced two md-raided (RAID1) disks with bigger ones and decided
> to check out how far I get with them when I put them in another machine.
> The kernel boots and then panics when it wants to mount the root
> filesystem on the disk.
>
> md: Autodetecting RAID array
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 19:20 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008 18:04:10 Chris Clonch wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 July 2008 11:50:21 Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:24:31 Robert - elists wrote:
> > > > > > What does 'crontab -u nobody -l' show ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not
I just replaced two md-raided (RAID1) disks with bigger ones and decided
to check out how far I get with them when I put them in another machine.
The kernel boots and then panics when it wants to mount the root
filesystem on the disk.
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays
md: autorun
md: autorun DONE
<
>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Miguel A. Velasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, Íd like to know what may I configure to send emails from my
> server with mailx please.
> I need to send mails to my email adress ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with logs
> and
On Sunday 20 July 2008 18:04:10 Chris Clonch wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008 11:50:21 Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:24:31 Robert - elists wrote:
> > > > > What does 'crontab -u nobody -l' show ?
> > > >
> > > > Nothing at all - it just returns to the prompt.
> > > >
> > > > Anne
On Sunday 20 July 2008 17:44:23 Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:24:31 Robert - elists wrote:
> >> > > What does 'crontab -u nobody -l' show ?
> >> >
> >> > Nothing at all - it just returns to the prompt.
> >> >
> >> > Anne
> >>
> >> Anne,
William Warren wrote on Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:04:43 -0400:
> checkout the bugtracker..this is a long running issue. The issue stems
> from newer servers/computers using sata optical drives.
Looks like you mean:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2622
I think I have the same issue. I want to boot
William Warren wrote on Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:40:25 -0400:
> however booting from the cd's of 5.x works fine.
Which supports someone's suggestion in that bug report that it thinks the
DVD is a CDROM ...
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.
On Sunday 20 July 2008 11:50:21 Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:24:31 Robert - elists wrote:
> > > > What does 'crontab -u nobody -l' show ?
> > >
> > > Nothing at all - it just returns to the prompt.
> > >
> > > Anne
> >
> > Anne,
> >
> > It should say "no crontab for nobody" or sho
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
>On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:24:31 Robert - elists wrote:
>> > > What does 'crontab -u nobody -l' show ?
>> >
>> > Nothing at all - it just returns to the prompt.
>> >
>> > Anne
>>
>> Anne,
>>
>> It should say "no crontab for nobody" or show the crontab
>>
>>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Lanny,
> Well, for the most part, I have all the security issues taken care of
> w/r/t logins, ssh, no root logins, etc.
Excellent!
> My main problem is as I stated is
> the fact that the co-lo site is somewhat diffi
Just in case anyone else needs to know - there's an exploit 'in the wild'
for Trixbox (which is CentOS based) that allows malicious code to be
installed on a server. I discovered that one of my Trixbox servers was
running 3 instances of a perl-based IRC botnet process called httpdse and
this was pe
On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:24:31 Robert - elists wrote:
> > > What does 'crontab -u nobody -l' show ?
> >
> > Nothing at all - it just returns to the prompt.
> >
> > Anne
>
> Anne,
>
> It should say "no crontab for nobody" or show the crontab
>
> Eh?
>
It doesn't do either
Anne
signature.asc
Des
> > What does 'crontab -u nobody -l' show ?
>
> Nothing at all - it just returns to the prompt.
>
> Anne
Anne,
It should say "no crontab for nobody" or show the crontab
Eh?
- rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
On Sunday 20 July 2008 14:05:45 Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Every day I see this in chkrootkit's log -
> >
> > Checking `crontab'... Warning: crontab for nobody found, possible
> > Lupper.Worm... not infected
> >
> > I know I met
Hi Lanny,
Well, for the most part, I have all the security issues taken care
of w/r/t logins, ssh, no root logins, etc. My main problem is as I
stated is the fact that the co-lo site is somewhat difficult to get
access to, however if I call the office, someone will meet me at the
place an
John Hinton wrote:
OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no
longer enough.
how do you mean?
opening port 53 in is still enough ... the outbound port is what is
randomized
not sure what kind of
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Every day I see this in chkrootkit's log -
>
> Checking `crontab'... Warning: crontab for nobody found, possible
> Lupper.Worm... not infected
>
> I know I met this once before, but I can't remember whether there is any cure
Every day I see this in chkrootkit's log -
Checking `crontab'... Warning: crontab for nobody found, possible
Lupper.Worm... not infected
I know I met this once before, but I can't remember whether there is any cure
for it. It doesn't seem possible to remove nobody in kcron, and there are no
t
37 matches
Mail list logo
