On 28.02.2014 13:15, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems
> changed for our users.
>
> currently I'm faced with the question:
>
> What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users
> which could als
- Original Message -
| Hi,
|
| over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems
| changed for our users.
|
| currently I'm faced with the question:
|
| What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few
| users
| which could also be enlarged; backuping the
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
>
> What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users
> which could also be enlarged; backuping the data is not the question.
Really? Does that mean you already have a backup, don't care if you
lose it, or that y
On 02/28/2014 08:45 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> This keeps /home and /var in separate filesystems, too, and there are
>> advantages to that.
> 'Resize as needed' is not at all the same as sharing a pool of space.
Exactly, and I would posit that
Rainer Traut writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running C6.5 64bit on an USB stick connected to a HP DL360G7;
> It is usually an ESXi host but eg for firmware updates (not available on
> SPP) I use this local installation.
>
> Problem are the lags and unresponsiveness we are seeing for example when
>
On 02/28/2014 08:15 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> ...
> Big in that context is up to couple of 100 TB may be.
>
> ...
> From my POV I could e.g. use hardware raidboxes, and use LVM and
> filesystem growth options to extend the final share, but what if one of
> the boxes crash totally
Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator a écrit :
> Hi,
>
If you are to have an ever-growing volume, I’d suggest some
distributed FS, like glusterfs, moosefs, lustre…
You need more space ? Add a box.
We do use happily moosefs at work for a couple years (begun with a
couple TB, now up to 250).
HTH
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> I'd highly recommend getting a NetApp storage device for something that big.
>
> It's more expensive up front, but the amount of heartache/time saved in the
> long run is WELL worth it.
>
My vote would be for a ZFS-based storage solution
I'd highly recommend getting a NetApp storage device for something that big.
It's more expensive up front, but the amount of heartache/time saved in the
long run is WELL worth it.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
On 02/26/2014 04:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
> on that other "one big partition"? /var in particular has an odd mix
> of OS and 'your' data and logs that may turn out to be big. And you
> may not know ahead of time what to all
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 04:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
>> on that other "one big partition"? /var in particular has an odd mix
>> of OS and 'your' data and logs that may turn out to be
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 08:03 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> > Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm
> still
> > trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk) system
> an
Hi,
over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems
changed for our users.
currently I'm faced with the question:
What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users
which could also be enlarged; backuping the data is not the question.
Big in that context i
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 02/27/2014 08:03 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm still
> trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk) system and
> load CentOS on it. I'm looking for the UEFI bios but don't understand
> this. I want to install LV
15 matches
Mail list logo
