Apologies for the late reply; I only just saw this message today.
On 2015-08-17, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> It shows as /dev/md/2, while it is called /dev/md2 if I boot into the OS.
It's possible that one is a symlink to the other. IIRC the /dev/md2
naming style is somewhat deprecated. If you can b
There are some errors on my root filesystem, so I need to fsck it. In
order to do this while the filesystem is unmounted, I'm booting from the
install disk. However, since the filesystem is on an mdraid device, I'm
not sure of the right way to get it assembled so I can check it.
If I do, mdad
El 09/04/13 20:41, Max Pyziur escribió:
> And there is no indication how much of the process has been completed
> (nothing like a %tage indicator), at least the way that I am running it.
Tip: if you have already launched "fsck" you can recover the progress
bar sending SIGUSR1 signal, see this be
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
>
>> I am running some fsck's on some of the larger drives (750GB and 2TB) that
>> are used for backups. There is a verbosity flag (-V); bu
Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
> I am running some fsck's on some of the larger drives (750GB and 2TB) that
> are used for backups. There is a verbosity flag (-V); but because of the
> size of the drives along with slowne
Greetings,
I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
root@leeloo ~> uname -a
Linux leeloo 2.6.18-308.24.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 4 17:42:30 EST 2012 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
root@leeloo ~> cat /proc/cpu
cat: /proc/cpu: No such file or directory
root@leeloo ~> cat /proc/c
On 9/29/12, Andy Smith wrote:
> On 29 September 2012 10:45, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All
>> My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with
>> #fsck -fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of
>> the installed applications is preventing
On 29 September 2012 10:45, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear All
> My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with
> #fsck -fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of
> the installed applications is preventing it from booting up (as can be seen
> in
Dear All
My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with #fsck
-fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of the
installed applications is preventing it from booting up (as can be seen in the
boot up process list). Can you please let me know how can
--On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:38:56 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 08:17 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>> However, if you're using pacemaker the RA (IIRC) has the option
>> of doing an 'fsck -p' before mounting. [...]
>
> "doing an 'fsck -p' before mounting" still means you h
On 04/12/2012 08:17 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Thursday, April 12, 2012 03:17:37 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>>>
>>> I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is
>>> a problem with one of them we switch t
--On Thursday, April 12, 2012 03:17:37 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>>
>> I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is
>> a problem with one of them we switch to the second one. [...]
>>
>> Is there a way to mak
On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is a
> problem with one of them we switch to the second one. Currently on the
> /dev/drbd0 (it has /xxx ext3 filesystem directly on it) we have some
> filesystem problem
Hi All.
I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is a
problem with one of them we switch to the second one. Currently on the
/dev/drbd0 (it has /xxx ext3 filesystem directly on it) we have some
filesystem problems (after fsck -n). I would like to correct these errors
b
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
> The reason it is not the default in CentOS is because it is not the
> default in RHEL.
>
> As to why it is not the default in RHEL, I can't say for sure ... BUT
> ... -y (auto answer yes) is more dangerous that -p (preen). The
> definitio
On 01/27/2012 11:19 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>>> returned
>>> that we when we boot them up have some
On 01/27/2012 12:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>>> returned
>>> that we when we boot them up have some
On 01/27/2012 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>> returned
>> that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
>> the default preen
>>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>> returned
>> that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
>> the defau
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
> returned
> that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
> the default preen
> doesn't fix but running fsck -y does.
>
> I want to e
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix but running fsck -y does.
I want to eliminate the -p (preen option) and always do the -y option
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this
>> morning,
>> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots*
>> of
>> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
> re
Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
reasonable speed.
Thanks to the folks who got this one. I *really* needed to
Hei,
Ok, as many of you pointed out, the raid arrays did not start
automatically on "linux rescue" boot (when not mounting the arrays).
I followed Mogens' advice: I let linux rescue mount the arrays, then
checked /etc/mtab and unmounted everything. After that fsck run ok.
(Turned out the files
On 07/22/2010 10:38 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
...
> I still don't know why fsck from the rescue dvd does not work.
You could try to let the rescue dvd mount the partitions.
Then you can umount them and fsck.
I don't think that the rescue disk assembles the RAID partitions
unless they are going to b
Jussi Hirvi schrieb:
> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
> everything. But I cannot.
>
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mo
> Are you using lvm on top of the mdraid?
>
> If so you need to fsck the lvs not the mds.
No lvm's.
I can boot the raid system, and
cat /proc/mdstat
shows clean arrays.
The automatic fsck reported problems a while ago, and corrected them.
When I now try to run certain rsync script, I ge
On 07/21/2010 09:12 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
> systems, and try to run
> fsck -y /dev/md0
> fsck -y /dev/md1
> fsck -y /dev/md2
>
> For each try I get an error message: "Superblock could not be found..."
> "The
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
> everything. But I cannot.
>
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
> everything. But I cannot.
>
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 d
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
everything. But I cannot.
The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
systems, and try to r
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 03/23/2010 09:49 AM:
>> sync wrote:
>>> Thanks for all replies .
>>>
>>> Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
>
>>> Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
>>>
>>> This time, the screen came up with these:
>>>
>>>
> sync wrote:
>> Thanks for all replies .
>>
>> Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
>> Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
>>
>> This time, the screen came up with these:
>>
>> Checking root filesystem:
>> -
sync wrote:
> Thanks for all replies .
>
> Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
>
> First, I used the CentOS 4.6 DVD to boot for the linux rescue and then
> i copy all data to the another server
>
> Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard di
Thanks for all replies .
Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
First, I used the CentOS 4.6 DVD to boot for the linux rescue and then i
copy all data to the another server
Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
This time, the screen ca
On 03/22/2010 08:33 PM, sync wrote:
> Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> 1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
> A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
>
> 2.Do you have backups?
> A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so its
sync wrote:
> Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> 1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
> A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
>
> 2.Do you have backups?
> A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so itself has not
> any bac
Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
2.Do you have backups?
A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so itself has not any
backups
3.Is the volume small e
2010/3/22 sync :
> Thanks for all reply...
>
>
> Because the boss don't let me do that .
> He said that would be dangerous and it would destroy all data in the hard
> disk
Well, then restore files from backups.
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
sync wrote, On 03/22/2010 05:11 AM:
> Thanks for all reply...
>
>
A) as Nicolas HINTED please read the _text_ that follows "Guidelines for CentOS
Mailing List posts" at
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
B) as time permits read the links in that section, I think the one
Thanks for all reply...
Because the boss don't let me do that .
He said that would be dangerous and it would destroy all data in the hard
disk
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote:
> sync wrote:
> > run fsck manually without a or p
sync wrote:
> run fsck manually without a or p options?
>
> Not yet ~
why not?
> i searched it via Google and found this website :
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Linux/Distributions/Red_Hat/Q_25043629.html
>
> i do that said but this time screen displayed this :
try reading the botto
Not yet ~
i searched it via Google and found this website :
http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Linux/Distributions/Red_Hat/Q_25043629.html
i do that said but this time screen displayed this :
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 : faild
Inodes that were part of a corrupted or phan linked list found .
.
2010/3/22 sync :
> hi , guys:
>
>
> when i reboot the server today ,the screen displays this ;
>
> ---
> Setting hostname xxx [OK]
>
> Your system appears to have shut down uncleanly
> Press Y within 1 seconds to
hi , guys:
when i reboot the server today ,the screen displays this ;
---
Setting hostname xxx [OK]
Your system appears to have shut down uncleanly
Press Y within 1 seconds to force file system integrity check
On 5/16/09, cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions are welcomed.
In the 7 1/2 years
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> cen...@911networks.com wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
>> Equinox86 wrote:
>>
>>> mmm why you not reboot?
>>
>> Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
>> people. Don't ask, they are having major "politica
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions are welcomed.
This URL ha
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 11:51 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
> Equinox86 wrote:
>
>> mmm why you not reboot?
>
> Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
> people. Don't ask, they are having major "political" fights between
> 2 divisions.
You really need to arrange
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions are welcomed.
You can run fsck wit
On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
Equinox86 wrote:
> mmm why you not reboot?
Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
people. Don't ask, they are having major "political" fights between
2 divisions.
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
_
mmm why you not reboot?
you can set the service you wan in init 1 and go it
2009/5/16
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode
Hi,
Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
All suggestions are welcomed.
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
Centos wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> our server is crashed and now some files are missing.
> when I do ls, I can see the file but when I do ls -la, file does not
> show up.
>
> I am going to do fsck, but was wondering if there is any
> other quick fix
> rather
> than umount and do fsck.
Fsck is a nec
Hello
our server is crashed and now some files are missing.
when I do ls, I can see the file but when I do ls -la, file does not
show up.
I am going to do fsck, but was wondering if there is any other quick fix
rather
than umount and do fsck.
Thanks
_
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 06:33 -0300, centos wrote:
> I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
> were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
>
AFAIK, the limit is on the size of the LUN, not RAID 5 in general.
-Steve
___
CentOS mailin
On Friday 10 August 2007, centos wrote:
> I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
> were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
Hardware raid5 is limited by the driver you use and the controller. Software
raid5 is not limited to 2 TiB.
On top of that you have to sort out th
I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
Dan Halbert wrote:
Dan Dansereau wrote:
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop th
Dan Dansereau wrote:
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop the fsck during the boot up?
To stop it in the future:
# tune2fs -c 0 -i 0 /dev/sda1 # or whatever device
See the
Dan Dansereau wrote:
> Hello
> I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
> An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
>
> Is there a way to suspend or stop the fsck during the boot up?
>
> The system seems to pick the most inopportune time to decide to reach
> the check coun
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop the fsck during the boot up?
The system seems to pick the most inopportune time to decide to reach
the check count limit... and with this many disks,
63 matches
Mail list logo
