Les Mikesell wrote:
Thanks! The new yum seems a bit different - maybe it's the
fastestmirror plugin. Would you recommend doing a 'yum update yum rpm'
before the complete run?
It should work OK either way, but I would do:
yum upgrade yum\* rpm
(just to make sure you get the newer plugins
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is there a quick way to tell where any particular machine is in the
minor-rev level when the release file just says 5?
Yes ... cat /etc/redhat-release
In 5.2, it says "CentOS release 5.2 (Final)"
You can also do:
rpm -q centos-release
it says :
centos-release-5-0.0
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS-5 is the Release
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5.
Yum upgrades will always get you all t
Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS-5 is the Release
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5.
Yum upgrades will always get you all the updates that are r
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5.
Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service pack
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
>>> Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
>>> and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5.
>>>
>>> Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service pack 2.
>>
6 matches
Mail list logo