> From: denverpi...@me.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:57:27 -0700
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] remote logging with rsyslog [SOLVED]
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
> >
> > Yep, that was it. Thanks for setting me
On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
>
> Yep, that was it. Thanks for setting me straight.
>
> And apologies for the top-posting reply previously. I pasted the reply and
> just
> wasn't paying attention. My mother raised me better than that.
No problem, was just a hunch... happe
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
> From: denverpi...@me.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:25:27 -0700
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] remote logging with rsyslog
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Nelson
nt log entry would be lost
while an unimportant entry will always get through.
> From: denverpi...@me.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:25:27 -0700
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] remote logging with rsyslog
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
> I can change things around so that tcp is used instead of RELP, and everything
> works that way. The problem is specific to using RELP in the normal background
> mode. I also tested the above RELP configuration on two Debian Wheezy boxes,
> each
This is a similar post to one I've made on the rsyslog list that has received
no responses after four days, so I figured I'd try here since the problem
seems to be CentOS specific. This is also my second attempt to send it to
this list as the first seems to have never showed up.
I am trying to te
6 matches
Mail list logo
