Alexander Farber wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Ramon Nieto wrote:
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
>>> Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
>> Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
>> web server f
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ramon Nieto wrote:
>>> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
>> Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
>
> Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
> web server farm with somewhere around 100
Ramon Nieto wrote:
>> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
>
> Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
web server farm with somewhere around 100 requests/second for most of
the day. Are you sure you a
John Doe wrote on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:06:28 -0800 (PST):
> Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
> "Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a denial of service
> attack when processing specially crafted requests."
> "This bug is fixed by Squid versions 2.7.STABLE6, 3.0.STABLE1
> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Uh oh http://people.redhat.com/mnagy/squid/ doesn't have them yet...
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John Doe wrote:
> Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
> "Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a denial of service attack
> when processing specially crafted requests."
Alexander Farber wrote:
>> Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
>> Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12...
>
> this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
> at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
> is better maintained.
Except you cannot really say,
> > this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
> > at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
> > is better maintained.
>
> CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
"Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a de
Alexander Farber wrote on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:20:49 +0100:
> this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
> at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
> is better maintained.
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Co
Alexander Farber wrote:
> Does anybody know of good Squid rpm's?
I have sourced our 2.6 packages from
http://people.redhat.com/mnagy/squid/ for the last few years without
problems.
Dean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Alexander Farber
>>> [r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
>>> squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
>> Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
>> Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12..
Thank you,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Alexander Farber
>> [r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
>> squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
>
> Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
> Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12...
> Latest 2.6 is STABLE22
From: Alexander Farber
> [r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
> squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12...
Latest 2.6 is STABLE22
> I've checked /var/log/messages and also
> /var/log/squid/* but don't
Hello,
I have a problem here with:
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
The web proxy process (used by 300-400 users)
seems to run ok:
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# ps uawwwx|grep squid
root 23
14 matches
Mail list logo
