Apologies for the late reply; I only just saw this message today.
On 2015-08-17, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> It shows as /dev/md/2, while it is called /dev/md2 if I boot into the OS.
It's possible that one is a symlink to the other. IIRC the /dev/md2
naming style is somewhat deprecated. If you can b
El 09/04/13 20:41, Max Pyziur escribió:
> And there is no indication how much of the process has been completed
> (nothing like a %tage indicator), at least the way that I am running it.
Tip: if you have already launched "fsck" you can recover the progress
bar sending SIGUSR1 signal, see this be
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
>
>> I am running some fsck's on some of the larger drives (750GB and 2TB) that
>> are used for backups. There is a verbosity flag (-V); bu
Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
> I am running some fsck's on some of the larger drives (750GB and 2TB) that
> are used for backups. There is a verbosity flag (-V); but because of the
> size of the drives along with slowne
On 9/29/12, Andy Smith wrote:
> On 29 September 2012 10:45, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All
>> My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with
>> #fsck -fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of
>> the installed applications is preventing
On 29 September 2012 10:45, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear All
> My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with
> #fsck -fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of
> the installed applications is preventing it from booting up (as can be seen
> in
--On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:38:56 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 08:17 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>> However, if you're using pacemaker the RA (IIRC) has the option
>> of doing an 'fsck -p' before mounting. [...]
>
> "doing an 'fsck -p' before mounting" still means you h
On 04/12/2012 08:17 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Thursday, April 12, 2012 03:17:37 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>>>
>>> I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is
>>> a problem with one of them we switch t
--On Thursday, April 12, 2012 03:17:37 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>>
>> I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is
>> a problem with one of them we switch to the second one. [...]
>>
>> Is there a way to mak
On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is a
> problem with one of them we switch to the second one. Currently on the
> /dev/drbd0 (it has /xxx ext3 filesystem directly on it) we have some
> filesystem problem
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
> The reason it is not the default in CentOS is because it is not the
> default in RHEL.
>
> As to why it is not the default in RHEL, I can't say for sure ... BUT
> ... -y (auto answer yes) is more dangerous that -p (preen). The
> definitio
On 01/27/2012 11:19 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>>> returned
>>> that we when we boot them up have some
On 01/27/2012 12:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>>> returned
>>> that we when we boot them up have some
On 01/27/2012 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>> returned
>> that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
>> the default preen
>>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
>> returned
>> that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
>> the defau
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
> returned
> that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
> the default preen
> doesn't fix but running fsck -y does.
>
> I want to e
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this
>> morning,
>> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots*
>> of
>> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
> re
Hei,
Ok, as many of you pointed out, the raid arrays did not start
automatically on "linux rescue" boot (when not mounting the arrays).
I followed Mogens' advice: I let linux rescue mount the arrays, then
checked /etc/mtab and unmounted everything. After that fsck run ok.
(Turned out the files
On 07/22/2010 10:38 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
...
> I still don't know why fsck from the rescue dvd does not work.
You could try to let the rescue dvd mount the partitions.
Then you can umount them and fsck.
I don't think that the rescue disk assembles the RAID partitions
unless they are going to b
Jussi Hirvi schrieb:
> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
> everything. But I cannot.
>
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mo
> Are you using lvm on top of the mdraid?
>
> If so you need to fsck the lvs not the mds.
No lvm's.
I can boot the raid system, and
cat /proc/mdstat
shows clean arrays.
The automatic fsck reported problems a while ago, and corrected them.
When I now try to run certain rsync script, I ge
On 07/21/2010 09:12 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
> systems, and try to run
> fsck -y /dev/md0
> fsck -y /dev/md1
> fsck -y /dev/md2
>
> For each try I get an error message: "Superblock could not be found..."
> "The
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
> everything. But I cannot.
>
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
> everything. But I cannot.
>
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 d
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 03/23/2010 09:49 AM:
>> sync wrote:
>>> Thanks for all replies .
>>>
>>> Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
>
>>> Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
>>>
>>> This time, the screen came up with these:
>>>
>>>
> sync wrote:
>> Thanks for all replies .
>>
>> Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
>> Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
>>
>> This time, the screen came up with these:
>>
>> Checking root filesystem:
>> -
sync wrote:
> Thanks for all replies .
>
> Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
>
> First, I used the CentOS 4.6 DVD to boot for the linux rescue and then
> i copy all data to the another server
>
> Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard di
Thanks for all replies .
Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
First, I used the CentOS 4.6 DVD to boot for the linux rescue and then i
copy all data to the another server
Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
This time, the screen ca
On 03/22/2010 08:33 PM, sync wrote:
> Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> 1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
> A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
>
> 2.Do you have backups?
> A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so its
sync wrote:
> Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> 1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
> A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
>
> 2.Do you have backups?
> A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so itself has not
> any bac
Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
2.Do you have backups?
A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so itself has not any
backups
3.Is the volume small e
2010/3/22 sync :
> Thanks for all reply...
>
>
> Because the boss don't let me do that .
> He said that would be dangerous and it would destroy all data in the hard
> disk
Well, then restore files from backups.
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
sync wrote, On 03/22/2010 05:11 AM:
> Thanks for all reply...
>
>
A) as Nicolas HINTED please read the _text_ that follows "Guidelines for CentOS
Mailing List posts" at
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
B) as time permits read the links in that section, I think the one
Thanks for all reply...
Because the boss don't let me do that .
He said that would be dangerous and it would destroy all data in the hard
disk
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote:
> sync wrote:
> > run fsck manually without a or p
sync wrote:
> run fsck manually without a or p options?
>
> Not yet ~
why not?
> i searched it via Google and found this website :
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Linux/Distributions/Red_Hat/Q_25043629.html
>
> i do that said but this time screen displayed this :
try reading the botto
Not yet ~
i searched it via Google and found this website :
http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Linux/Distributions/Red_Hat/Q_25043629.html
i do that said but this time screen displayed this :
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 : faild
Inodes that were part of a corrupted or phan linked list found .
.
2010/3/22 sync :
> hi , guys:
>
>
> when i reboot the server today ,the screen displays this ;
>
> ---
> Setting hostname xxx [OK]
>
> Your system appears to have shut down uncleanly
> Press Y within 1 seconds to
On 5/16/09, cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions are welcomed.
In the 7 1/2 years
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> cen...@911networks.com wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
>> Equinox86 wrote:
>>
>>> mmm why you not reboot?
>>
>> Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
>> people. Don't ask, they are having major "politica
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions are welcomed.
This URL ha
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 11:51 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
> Equinox86 wrote:
>
>> mmm why you not reboot?
>
> Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
> people. Don't ask, they are having major "political" fights between
> 2 divisions.
You really need to arrange
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions are welcomed.
You can run fsck wit
On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
Equinox86 wrote:
> mmm why you not reboot?
Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
people. Don't ask, they are having major "political" fights between
2 divisions.
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
_
mmm why you not reboot?
you can set the service you wan in init 1 and go it
2009/5/16
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode
Centos wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> our server is crashed and now some files are missing.
> when I do ls, I can see the file but when I do ls -la, file does not
> show up.
>
> I am going to do fsck, but was wondering if there is any
> other quick fix
> rather
> than umount and do fsck.
Fsck is a nec
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 06:33 -0300, centos wrote:
> I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
> were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
>
AFAIK, the limit is on the size of the LUN, not RAID 5 in general.
-Steve
___
CentOS mailin
On Friday 10 August 2007, centos wrote:
> I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
> were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
Hardware raid5 is limited by the driver you use and the controller. Software
raid5 is not limited to 2 TiB.
On top of that you have to sort out th
I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
Dan Halbert wrote:
Dan Dansereau wrote:
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop th
Dan Dansereau wrote:
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop the fsck during the boot up?
To stop it in the future:
# tune2fs -c 0 -i 0 /dev/sda1 # or whatever device
See the
Dan Dansereau wrote:
> Hello
> I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
> An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
>
> Is there a way to suspend or stop the fsck during the boot up?
>
> The system seems to pick the most inopportune time to decide to reach
> the check coun
52 matches
Mail list logo
