[CentOS] Strange reboots

2008-04-10 Thread Linux
Hi, I have a CentOS 5.0 running as a web server. # uname -a Linux hostnamehidden.net 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 5 11:37:38 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs, without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

2008-04-10 Thread Linux
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Benjamin Karhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ] Every 59 minutes (maybe every hour) it reboots without any logs, > ] without any traces and unfortunately with breaking software raid. > ] After reboot dmesg does not have any strange entries. > this really only hel

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

2008-04-10 Thread Linux
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:43 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 02:02 +0300, Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Benjamin Karhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ] Every 59 minutes (maybe every

Re: [CentOS] Strange reboots

2008-04-12 Thread Linux
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:43 AM, William L. Maltby > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 02:02 +0300, Linux wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Benja

[CentOS] mdadm update

2008-05-12 Thread Linux
Hi, I have uptodate x86_64 CentOS 5 with official repositories. mdadm version is v2.5.4 - 13 October 2006 This version is known to have problems with raid10 configurations. Sadly, I have a 4 disk raid10 on this system. I tried adding Dag's repository but system complains about some packages whic

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

2008-05-12 Thread Linux
Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola... Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found. I am using CentO

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

2008-05-12 Thread Linux
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote: > > Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... > > > > I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and &

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

2008-05-12 Thread Linux
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote: > > What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well, > > show me a way to prove. > /var/log/messages ? Only a small part

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

2008-05-14 Thread Linux
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a matter of agreeing to disagree on the release of a kernel and > a supported file system. If you had read my thread and subsequent > paragraph you're taking issue with properly, you would have gotten that. > My who

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

2008-05-14 Thread Linux
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > btw, what is WITH all these lame gmail addresses? linuxlist ? centoslist > ?? Do I call you Mr Linux, or Mr List ? Nothing to do with gmail. About calling me, it's a nice thing but probably not n

Re: [CentOS] Best Motherboard

2008-05-15 Thread Linux
I guess your Gigabyte is a desktop one Well, in production I used to use Intel server and workstation boards. Not the best but more cooperative than most manifacturers with kernel team I guess. Currently I am testing some AMD stuff... On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Ryan Nichols <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1

2008-05-20 Thread Linux
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Typically Linux hackers can hack the kernel to use very large RAM. Current > applications are built to access up to 4Gb RAM at a time only. For machines > with RAM of more than 4Gb you need to verify that the

Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1

2008-05-21 Thread Linux
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like it is the way Intel chips are designed. One solution would be to > ensure that 64bit is used. However, due to cost I am sure many would have > gone for the 32bit machines with AHCI mode. Well, 64bit is the solution t

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-22 Thread Linux
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Guy Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You do not need two (2) raid controllers unless you want to have > redundancy at the controller level. Adaptec, 3Ware, etc do RAID 50. > For RAID 50, you need at least 6 disks. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID > > > Fo

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-23 Thread Linux
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is >> much more intelligently designed than any >> closed-source-embedded-raid-controller. > > This was valid until...quite a few years ago. Has hard

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-23 Thread Linux
disks, mmm... go see: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundant_array_of_independent_disks mdadm Raid-10 is neither 1+0 nor 0+1. So 3 disks is enough to supply a minimum level of redundancy. You should have 2 copies of each stripes on either 2 of 3 disks. But in 3 disk configuration loss of

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-24 Thread Linux
fair comparison. However, none of them tends to show theirs for a comparison. But again, according to general inclination, I have a great feeling that I am right. Besides, this is all about the philosophy of open-source. linux kernel-raid still has my vote. Nevertheless, closed-source firmwares

Re: [CentOS] read only root file system

2008-05-25 Thread Linux
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Fred Noz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In addition to easy maintenance, readonly-root adds a layer of security. > The security is broken if someone gains access to the root user, but > then many security protections are lost if someone gains root. However, this shou

[CentOS] Hourly restart

2008-05-25 Thread Linux
Hi, Without any update, hardware/software modification, etc... one of my systems "Hourly restart" problem started again. Currently, I counted 5 restarts at 59th minute. No log entry, no console error, nothing really interesting. If I do not see camera records with my own eyes, I'll suspect about s

Re: [CentOS] Hourly restart

2008-05-25 Thread Linux
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Gregg McClintic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anything in the bios called watchdog turned on? Waiting for morning (it's late night here) for further diag. Should I disable it? Or is it malfunctioning because of CentOS? Thanks... __

Re: [CentOS] read only root file system

2008-05-25 Thread Linux
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been reading some of your recent comments, Anonymous looser, and > I've really got to say this - you seem to make some authoritative style > comments on things you really dont know much about. eg. in this case - > the

Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

2008-05-25 Thread Linux
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe you cannot do it via the installer yet. Can anybody confirm the > presence of raid10 personality in Centos 5? Installer does not have raid10 as an option. Not sure whether boot cd has this module or not. But a

Re: [CentOS] XFS install issue

2008-05-31 Thread Linux
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also normally build all the extras kmods while I build the centosplus > kernel, so they were also not yet done ... however I did go ahead and build I dont intend to blame anybody but kmod_xfs was a couple of days late fo

Re: [CentOS] DMA mode

2008-06-02 Thread Linux
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:22 PM, David Mackintosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...which I think is because the IDE controller isn't really > recognized, or is pretending to be a SATA controller: For my cruiosity, what is your current kernel version? ___ C

Re: [CentOS] preferred software RAID 10?

2008-07-18 Thread Linux
.conf file. Well, I have many working configurations with 4 disk cheap machines. Guess I should say something. /sd[abcd]1: 20 GB, ext3, RAID-1 as /dev/md0, linux-raid autodetect (type: fd), boot flag active, mounted as "/" (incl. /boot) /sd[abcd][23...]: whatever you want I installed grub

[CentOS] max mount count incovenient

2008-01-08 Thread Linux Man
Hello group I added a new partition in fstab, and works without a problem. I used mkfs.ext3 to create the partition. My problem is that every 26 boots, the system tells that the partition have no been checked since 26 systems boots, ant start to check my new partition. This is a lot of time consumi

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

2008-01-08 Thread Linux Man
I read that man page before, but had not seen anything useful, shame on me :( Do you say, for example, change mount count with tune2fs? Thanks a lot Best regards 2008/1/8, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Linux Man wrote: > > Hello group > > I added a new partition in fst

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

2008-01-08 Thread Linux Man
Works great! thanks to all !! :) It's a good choice to force be checked at boot time the partition "/"? 2008/1/8, Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I read that man page before, but had not seen anything useful, shame on me :( > Do you say, for example, change mount cou

[CentOS] Stage2.img

2007-08-28 Thread semi linux
I've got a RAID card (3ware 9650SE-2LP) that wasn't supported by the in-kernel driver until 2.6.19+ Since CentOS 5.0 is based on 2.6.18-8.el5 is was looking for a way to incorporate their driver from the website so I wouldn't have to use the "linux dd" kernel option

Re: [CentOS] Stage2.img

2007-08-28 Thread semi linux
nting / recreating CentOS 5 stage2.img? It's obviously different from the old ones... is this documented anywhere? Thanks! - G. On 8/28/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > semi linux wrote: > > Since CentOS 5.0 is based on 2.6.18-8.el5 is was looking for a way to > >

Re: [CentOS] Stage2.img

2007-08-29 Thread semi linux
On 8/28/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > semi linux wrote: > > Good call... I had thought of that but had assumed it would only > > present me the same options as anaconda does (all local - hdx and/or > > fdx)... as it turns-out, the --source=http:// co

[CentOS] rootpw and graphical mode?

2007-09-04 Thread semi linux
Is there some kind of caveat to using the rootpw --iscrypted directive and then specifying a graphical install? I always seem to get the prompt coming up... If I remove the graphical and do a text install, it works fine and if I remove the --iscrypted and put a plain-text password in there, it wo

[CentOS] Re: rootpw and graphical mode?

2007-09-04 Thread semi linux
Sorry, should have specified - I'm using kickstart to load my machine(s). On 9/4/07, semi linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there some kind of caveat to using the rootpw --iscrypted directive > and then specifying a graphical install? > > I always seem to get the pro

Re: [CentOS] Re: rootpw and graphical mode?

2007-09-05 Thread semi linux
On 9/5/07, Johnn Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > semi linux wrote: > > Sorry, should have specified - I'm using kickstart to load my machine(s). > > > > On 9/4/07, semi linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is there some kind of caveat to using

Re: [CentOS] Re: rootpw and graphical mode?

2007-09-07 Thread semi linux
eleted the lines to make sure I don't have any special characters in there... The only thin I can think of is that maybe my crypted password contains an escape sequence that might not be properly handled in anaconda? I'm completely stumped. - G. On 9/6/07, Johnn Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[CentOS] CentOS5 Network Problems

2007-09-20 Thread semi linux
I have a very odd problem connecting to some websites from my CentOS 5 box Target websites: www.connecttech.com www.3ware.com (two of my HW vendors) I can usually get some kind of response, but if the content (download or page itself) is larger in size (downloads never pass 100K), then it hangs..

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS5 Network Problems

2007-09-20 Thread semi linux
On 9/20/07, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > semi linux spake the following on 9/20/2007 4:31 PM: > > I have a very odd problem connecting to some websites from my CentOS 5 box > > > > Target websites: > > www.connecttech.com > > www.3ware.com &

Re: [CentOS] CentOS5 Network Problems

2007-09-20 Thread semi linux
On 9/20/07, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > semi linux wrote: > > I have a very odd problem connecting to some websites from my CentOS 5 box > > > > Target websites: > > www.connecttech.com > > www.3ware.com > > (two of my HW vendors) &g

Re: [CentOS] CentOS5 Network Problems

2007-09-20 Thread semi linux
On 9/20/07, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 at 4:31pm, semi linux wrote > > > I have a very odd problem connecting to some websites from my CentOS 5 box > > > > Target websites: > > www.connecttech.com > > www.3ware.co

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS5 Network Problems

2007-09-21 Thread semi linux
On 9/21/07, Tony Mountifield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 at 5:04pm, semi linux wrote > > > > > Wicked! that worked... How weird... I'm goi

[CentOS] Waking up X

2007-09-26 Thread semi linux
I just finished installing CentOS 5 (again)... and I'm having trouble with my X config (I _think_). If I 'startx' then switch to a console (using CTRL+ALT+F*) and then back to X (CTRL+ALT+F7), 1/2 the time it comes back, the other half I get a black screen and I can never recover the session. X i

Re: [CentOS] Waking up X

2007-09-27 Thread semi linux
On 9/27/07, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/26/07, semi linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just finished installing CentOS 5 (again)... and I'm having trouble > > with my X config (I _think_). > > > > If I 'startx' then swi

Re: [CentOS] Re: rootpw and graphical mode?

2007-10-02 Thread semi linux
ferent password altogether... are there any other suggestions? - Gareth On 9/7/07, Johnn Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > semi linux wrote: > > The only thin I can think of is that maybe my crypted > password > > contains an escape sequence that might not be properly >

[CentOS] Anaconda Partial Freeze...

2007-10-02 Thread semi linux
Hey, I'm trying to run a kickstart script on a new piece of hardware... I've never used this HW before, so it's possible that there may be something faulty... After the DVD boots, I type "linux ks=http://blah/blah.ks"; and hit enter. Once I get to the anaconda line

[CentOS] Lan Kernel Problem

2007-10-22 Thread Linux Man
I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Firewall. I'm using CentOS 4.5, with an "old" motherboard (Asus A8V-X), and two Ethernet NIC, based on a realtek chip, that's widely supported under 2.4 and later kernel (the cards were functioning excellent in another PC wh

Re: [CentOS] Lan Kernel Problem

2007-10-22 Thread Linux Man
No, it doesn't use that. The "unusual" things that I use is Nat (S and D), and mark to support TC. 2007/10/22, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoting Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Fire

Re: [CentOS] Lan Kernel Problem

2007-10-23 Thread Linux Man
fedora fc1 or knoppix witch module was loaded for your two nic. > Then try a > # modprobe > then > # dmesg > to look if both nics where recognized. > If so you have to update your modprobe.conf > > Alain > > Regards > > > > On 10/22/07, Linux Man <[EMAI

[CentOS] powernow-k8 config

2007-10-24 Thread Linux Man
Hello I'm building a router/proxy/firewall, the default governor is ondemand, but for this application, what governor is best suited? (for example conservative?) Thanks at all! Best regards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

[CentOS] Re: powernow-k8 config

2007-10-24 Thread Linux Man
I forgot tell that the os is CentOS 5 i386 sorry 2007/10/24, Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello > I'm building a router/proxy/firewall, the default governor is > ondemand, but for this application, what governor is best suited? (for > example conservative?) > Tha

Re: [CentOS] How to create initrd.img

2007-11-12 Thread semi linux
On Oct 15, 2007 5:49 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Hrbáč wrote: > > Hi, > > anyone to point me URL on initrd.img creating? I have custom kernel and > > want to create initrd.img for install media. > > mkinitrd /tmp/initrd.img 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5.hrb -v -f create unusable > > fi

Re: [CentOS] How to create initrd.img

2007-11-14 Thread semi linux
On Nov 13, 2007 5:49 AM, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alain Spineux napsal(a): > > On Oct 15, 2007 2:09 PM, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> anyone to point me URL on initrd.img creating? I have custom kernel and > >> want to create initrd.img for install media. > >>

[CentOS] how to run CentOS 8.2 under new WSL2?

2020-08-17 Thread Dev Linux
I want to run CentOS 8.2 (2004) under Windows 10 Pro (2004) that comes with WSL2 1. Is there a list of steps anywhere, that would help me download what I need, and get CentOS 8.2 running under WSL2? 2. What would I need to download? (need direct URL - there are so many options for CentOS 8.2 , I a

[CentOS] Microsoft .mdb files in Open office

2009-11-23 Thread linux-crazy
Hi, Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on Centos 5.3 ? Thanks linux ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Anyone using fedora as guest/vm on Centos

2009-12-09 Thread Linux student
Hi folks, I just want to know if someone have any experience with fedora installed as guest/VM on Centos. thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using fedora as guest/vm on Centos

2009-12-09 Thread Linux student
Neil Aggarwal on 2009-12-09 22:55 PM +0500, wrote : >> I just want to know if someone have any experience with >> fedora installed >> as guest/VM on Centos. >> > > Take a look at this page: > http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Guest_Support_Status > for KVM support for specific guests. > > I hope

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using fedora as guest/vm on Centos

2009-12-09 Thread Linux student
Ray Van Dolson on 2009-12-09 22:52 PM +0500, wrote : > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:44:15PM +0500, Linux student wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I just want to know if someone have any experience with fedora installed >> as guest/VM on Centos. >> >> thanks.

Re: [CentOS] mail program question

2010-01-22 Thread firdaus linux
QmailRocks, powerful but hadn't develop anymore ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading from Fedora Core 7 to CentOS 5.4

2010-01-22 Thread firdaus linux
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: > Hi there -- > > I need to upgrade one of our systems from its current distribution, Fedora > Core 7, to the most recent > version distribution, release 5.4, of the CentOS operating system. Can I do > an in-place upgrade of the > operatin

Re: [CentOS] perl question

2010-01-29 Thread linux-crazy
x27;t locate Net/SMPP.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl

Re: [CentOS] pls help about changing network card but assign to another ethx

2010-02-05 Thread linux-crazy
ot; http://www.gscore.org/blog/index.php/post/2008/12/16/udev-hell Thanks On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:51 AM, adrian kok wrote: > Hi > > I change eth1 from realtek to dlink but the centos is showing eth2 instead of > eth1 > > In another version of linux, I can change 70-persiste

[CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, apache cpus usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box with just 8 users or so. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the work 'atack' under command PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
sorry typos amended Guys, apache's cpu usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box ( 2gb ram) with just 8 users or so. This newver happended before. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the word 'atack' under c

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > some google foo shows this is a WINDOWS exploit not a linux one. > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/analyzing-apache-logs-174552/ > ___ yes, william, i saw those links when i googledi too did n

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
reply below - Original Message > From: John R. Dennison > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 11:43:46 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:23:16PM -0700, Linux Advocate

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
My replies below i m just so down in the dumps nowaaah - Original Message > From: Neil Aggarwal > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 1:38:05 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > The original poster stated

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: Anne Wilson > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote: > > He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he > > can not readily identify running under apache named "atack"; > > where does "windows" co

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
> > as an aside? did he say if he even looked on the net for anything related to > this?? i tried googling for 'centos apache atack" but did not get anything substantial. i tried locating a binary file called ' atack' but got nothing. ___

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: John R. Dennison > > I stand by my previous advice - the box is compromised, can not > be trusted, and as a responsible admin he should be working on > re-installing it, evaluating what web-apps he had running that > led to this in the firs

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
BRUCE U ARE A F*** GENIUS MAN ! u were right brothanx for spending the time on this man more info below ! - Original Message > From: bruce > To: linuxhous...@yahoo.com > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 9:53:24 PM > Subject: RE: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache

Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating

2009-06-12 Thread Linux Advocate
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers > wrote: > > Anyone have any idea as to why setroubleshootd would be dominating the > > system: > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND > > 2371 root 25 0 1884m 1.8g 4100 R 100.2 44.7 680:06.40 > > se

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
S SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND >23119 apache15 0 964 556 472 S 0.7 0.0 0:03.68 atack >When i 'ps -ef' i can see many lines as below; >apache 24253 23378 0 10:54 ?00:00:00 ./atack 100 >apache 24286 23378 0 10:59 ?00:00:00 ./atack 100

Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... - Original Message > From: Ralph Angenendt > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 2:46:40 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating > > Linux Advocate wrote: > > > > > strace -p And see what it is doing?

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: bruce > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 3:20:24 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > and if you don't figure out what caused the issue... working on it bro :) one of the pointers here w

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: William L. Maltby > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 12:56:22 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:33 -0700, Linux Advocate wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... - Original Message > From: Filipe Brandenburger > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 9:58:51 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > I suggest you start by looking at Apache's logs, Filipe, good idea.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
john, replies below... > Linux Advocate wrote: > > DID THIS GUY ACTUALLY SAVE A FILE ON MY HARD DISK??? > > AA??? > > > > Was this why rkhunter popped out with this warning? > > > > * Filesystem checks &g

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-16 Thread Linux Advocate
> cmdshell.php) > > ? The horde framework was installed from the centos repo.!!! > > > I don't think the horde set on CentOS is very current. I just used the tarball > from the horde website, and I keep it current. ok. its just that with centos being a redhat clone and so on. all the rpm

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....[SOLVED]

2009-06-18 Thread Linux Advocate
thanx guys. Lets close this thread. bye. - Original Message > From: Scott Silva > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:36:27 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > on 6-16-2009 10:26 PM Linux Advocat

Re: [CentOS] ssh security

2009-06-19 Thread Linux Advocate
> > [Normal log stuff from dictionary attack deleted...] > > This is common, and, presuming you have good passwords or only > accept authorized_keys, not a real problem other than large log > files. > > Look at fail2ban for a method that will automatically add > iptables blocks when this occurs

Re: [CentOS] Program to ban sniffers

2009-06-20 Thread Linux Advocate
> > That program would then, upon receiving a 'sniff' or 'user' would then add > that ip to the deny hosts lists..for either a long or short time. > > Using this would seem like a win as you can easily grab someone before they > can get somewhere one hopes. > Also, by opening up a few other

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
get ; 1. fail2ban - it blocks failed login ips etc 2. get shorewall or any iptables front end and restrict ips to the ranges u need ( or even specific ips) 3. run ssh on a nonstandard port 4. good, long password these steps will go a long way and will get u started. - Original Message -

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
s a repackaging of the linux virtual server software, along with a web-based front-end. You can find information about that in the CentOS docs and also by googling for "redhat piranha". On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, fmb fmb wrote: > Hi, > > I am thinking of setting up two s

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Linux Advocate Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 11:18 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster taling abt piranha... i understand that its LVS + webfrontend and is suitable fro webpages and so on

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
ww.JAMMConsulting.com >100% uptime for your e-commerce site! Stay fully >operational >even with a db server failure. Ask me about the GRed >database. > > > ____ From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On B

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
same here. i really must thank dag wiers and gang for all the good work. But If epel and rpmforge can work together , that's great. - Original Message > From: Ron Loftin > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:13:33 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linu

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
same > > would hold for any large project (the kernel, firefox, etc.) > > And... are you happy with the quality of the huge $h1t which > is Firefox? Because I am not. > > As for the Linux kernel, they pushed in all kind of crap. > Back in 1996, I was running Linux with

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
gt; David Hrbác a écrit : > > > > > Niki, > > that's starting the flame. Compare to PLD linux... more than 1 > > RPMs... > > Well, no flame intended. So let me just add this. I'm a happy RPMForge > repo user. No other third-party repos. I'

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
david, could u tell me how to build frm SRPMS. i m not good in this area and would like to improve. - Original Message > From: David Hrbác( > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:52:37 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag > > Niki Kovacs napsal(a

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
> > Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are > already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro at present), > why doesn't everyone do as Dag suggested, and adopt a handful of > packages and help maintain them at rpmforge for the benefit of everyone.

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
great. thanx. - Original Message > From: Robert Heller >could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and > would like to learn this. > > Simple form (should work with most packages): > > # rpmbuild --rebuild package-version-release.srpm > > 'man rpmbuild' for m

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:18, Linux Advocatewrote: > > could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and would > like to learn this. > > This article in the Wiki should get you going... > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM &

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
can dag & karanbir sort of sum up this thread as to how list members can work together on improving all the additional non-redhat-originated packages from rpmforge,etc. As for radu-cristian, relax bro. As for others (myself included), lets all chill out. this thread should not evolve into p

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-03 Thread Linux Advocate
> > enough is enough already. > > can some centos admin please discipline, ban and/or get rid of Radu-Cristian > FOTESCU aka beranger...@yahoo.ca > > please? > > not only has he physically threatened a contributor, his language & behavior > are more than inappropriate for such a profess

[CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-03 Thread Linux Advocate
guys, i have installed mailscanner, spamassassin, etc on my machine. This was done sometime ago. Some of these rpms i got not frm centos repos. What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this installled package come from. yum info packagename just says; repo : ins

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Frank, > On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:33:52 -0700 (PDT) > Linux Advocate wrote: > > > What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this > installled package come from. > > rpm -qi packagename > > # rpm -qi spamassass

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this > installled package come from. > > rpm -qi packagename # rpm -qi mailscanner Name: mailscanner Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 4.74.13 Vendor:

[CentOS] RPMs for vispan , spamstat, phplistadmin

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual and would like to experiment with them. 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan is better fit for reporting) 2. I have googled for their centos rpms but no luck? Any ideas whe

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
> > Yes, I have found this is a limitation of yum. It would be nice if the > information about the source repository could be stored somewhere. > > If these were installed after the initial OS installation, and you haven't > done a yum clean, you might be able to glean some info from the cache

Re: [CentOS] firewall question

2009-08-06 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: William L. Maltby > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 4:15:40 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewall question > > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 17:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > > > > Or IPcop? > > > > > > BTW, Scott and other IPCop users

Re: [CentOS] RPMs for vispan , spamstat, phplistadmin

2009-08-08 Thread Linux Advocate
> Guys, > > i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual > and > would like to experiment with them. > > 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan > is > better fit for reporting) > 2. I have googled for their centos rpms b

  1   2   >