Hi,
no, I have it basically ready but I have to run some tests before.
You'll have it in the next days!
Danny
Am 21.11.2012 01:23, schrieb Sage Weil:
> If you haven't gotten to this yet, I'll go ahead and jump on it..
> let me know!
>
> Thanks- sage
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wro
If you haven't gotten to this yet, I'll go ahead and jump on it.. let me
know!
Thanks-
sage
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
> keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ext4 easily.
>
> Add new key to define the osd
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Am 15.11.2012 01:12, schrieb Sage Weil:
> > Hi Danny,
> >
> > Have you had a chance to work on this? I'd like to include this
> > in bobtail. If you don't have time we can go ahead an implement it, but
> > I'd like avoid duplicating eff
Hi Sage,
Am 15.11.2012 01:12, schrieb Sage Weil:
> Hi Danny,
>
> Have you had a chance to work on this? I'd like to include this
> in bobtail. If you don't have time we can go ahead an implement it, but
> I'd like avoid duplicating effort.
I already work on it. Do you have a deadline for bob
Hi Danny,
Have you had a chance to work on this? I'd like to include this
in bobtail. If you don't have time we can go ahead an implement it, but
I'd like avoid duplicating effort.
Thanks!
sage
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> sorry for the late reply, was absent som
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> sorry for the late reply, was absent some weeks and busy with other issues.
>
> Am 17.08.2012 01:40, schrieb Sage Weil:
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> >>> As for the n
Hi Sage,
sorry for the late reply, was absent some weeks and busy with other issues.
Am 17.08.2012 01:40, schrieb Sage Weil:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> As for the new options, I suggest:
>>>
>>> * osd fs type
>>> * osd
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > As for the new options, I suggest:
> >
> > * osd fs type
> > * osd fs devs (will work for mkcephfs, not for new stuff)
> > * osd fs path
> > * osd fs options
>
> What does osd_fs_path mean, an
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> I'm not sure how well our config system will handle dynamic variable
> names -- ceph-authtool was fine with me just putting data in
*ceph-conf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> As for the new options, I suggest:
>
> * osd fs type
> * osd fs devs (will work for mkcephfs, not for new stuff)
> * osd fs path
> * osd fs options
What does osd_fs_path mean, and how is it different from the osd_data dir?
I'm expecting t
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > Am 10.08.2012 17:54, schrieb Sage Weil:
> > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > >> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
> > >> keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ex
Comment below in-line:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
>> Am 10.08.2012 17:54, schrieb Sage Weil:
>> > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
>> >> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
>> >> keys to be able to
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> Am 10.08.2012 17:54, schrieb Sage Weil:
> > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> >> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
> >> keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ext4 easily.
> >>
> >> Add new key to define the o
Am 10.08.2012 17:54, schrieb Sage Weil:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
>> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
>> keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ext4 easily.
>>
>> Add new key to define the osd fs type: 'fstype', which can get
>> defined in the
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
> keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ext4 easily.
>
> Add new key to define the osd fs type: 'fstype', which can get
> defined in the [osd] section for all OSDs.
>
> Replace:
> -
On 08/10/2012 09:53 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Danny Kukawka wrote:
So you mean chef?! Will there be an alternative to simply setup a
cluster from console?
We (SUSE) are already working on an own chef ceph cookbook. But from
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Danny Kukawka
> wrote:
> > So you mean chef?! Will there be an alternative to simply setup a
> > cluster from console?
> >
> > We (SUSE) are already working on an own chef ceph cookbook. But from
> > what I've seen till
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> So you mean chef?! Will there be an alternative to simply setup a
> cluster from console?
>
> We (SUSE) are already working on an own chef ceph cookbook. But from
> what I've seen till now it's really hard and more laborious to initially
> se
Am 09.08.2012 18:53, schrieb Tommi Virtanen:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
>> I'm embarrassed to admit I haven't been keeping up with this,
>> but I seem to recall that early versions didn't handle a
>> journal on a partition. Did I get that wrong, or maybe that
>> capabilit
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> And where can I find this new "OSD hotplugging" style init? Is there any
> documentation?
mkcephfs does not use the new style. The Chef cookbooks we have do. If
you use the Juju Charms that Canonical has been working on, those
should also use
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
> I'm embarrassed to admit I haven't been keeping up with this,
> but I seem to recall that early versions didn't handle a
> journal on a partition. Did I get that wrong, or maybe that
> capability exists now? In the past I've found it to have a
Am 09.08.2012 18:26, schrieb Tommi Virtanen:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Danny Kukawka wrote:
>> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
>> keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ext4 easily.
>>
>> Add new key to define the osd fs type: 'fstype', which can get
On 08/09/2012 10:26 AM, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
mkcephfs is not a viable route forward. For example, it is unable to
expand a pre-existing cluster.
The new "OSD hotplugging" style init is much, much nicer. And does
more than just mkfs& mount.
I'm embarrassed to admit I haven't been keeping up w
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
> keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ext4 easily.
>
> Add new key to define the osd fs type: 'fstype', which can get
> defined in the [osd] section for all OSDs.
I'm g
Remove btrfs specific keys and replace them by more generic
keys to be able to replace btrfs with e.g. xfs or ext4 easily.
Add new key to define the osd fs type: 'fstype', which can get
defined in the [osd] section for all OSDs.
Replace:
- 'btrfs devs' -> 'devs'
- 'btrfs path' -> 'fs path'
- 'btr
25 matches
Mail list logo
