Re: [ceph-users] Cache tiering and target_max_bytes

2014-08-17 Thread Paweł Sadowski
On 08/14/2014 10:30 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Pawe? Sadowski wrote: >> W dniu 14.08.2014 17:20, Sage Weil pisze: >>> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Pawe? Sadowski wrote: Hello, I've a cluster of 35 OSD (30 HDD, 5 SSD) with cache tiering configured. During tests it looks

Re: [ceph-users] cache pools on hypervisor servers

2014-08-17 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Thanks a lot for your input. I will proceed with putting the cache pool on the storage layer instead. Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Sage Weil" > To: "Andrei Mikhailovsky" > Cc: "Robert van Leeuwen" , > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Sent: Thursday, 14 August, 2014 6:33:25 PM > Sub

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW problems

2014-08-17 Thread Linux Chips
On Mon 18 Aug 2014 12:45:33 AM AST, Bachelder, Kurt wrote: Hi Marco – In CentOS 6, you also had to edit /etc/httpd/conf.d/fastcgi.conf to turn OFF the fastcgi wrapper. I haven’t tested in v7 yet, but I’d guess it’s required there too: # wrap all fastcgi script calls in suexec FastCgiWrapper O

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW problems

2014-08-17 Thread Bachelder, Kurt
Hi Marco – In CentOS 6, you also had to edit /etc/httpd/conf.d/fastcgi.conf to turn OFF the fastcgi wrapper. I haven’t tested in v7 yet, but I’d guess it’s required there too: # wrap all fastcgi script calls in suexec FastCgiWrapper Off Give that a try, if you haven’t already – restart httpd

[ceph-users] active+remapped after remove osd via ceph osd out

2014-08-17 Thread Dominik Mostowiec
Hi, After ceph osd out ( 1 osd ) cluster stopped rebalancing on 10621 active+clean, 2 active+remapped, 1 active+degraded+remapped; My crushmap is clean, there is not 'empty' device's. grep device /tmp/crush1.txt | grep -v osd | grep -v '^#' | wc -l 0 Can You help me with this? "up": [

Re: [ceph-users] ceph cluster inconsistency?

2014-08-17 Thread Haomai Wang
Hi sage, I'm thinking about how to encode/decode the object name to key in DB without changing sorting order. What do you think of this idea: avoid the separate character disturb the sorting order, we can introduce the length for each field. For example, [hash]$[name]$[key]$[nspace]$[snap_id]$[p